Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHRISTCHURCH.

(From our Correspondent.)

On Monday several cases worthy of notice were brought before Captain Simeon, R.M., Mr. Wakefield, and Mr. Phillips. Stephen Lee was convicted of having stolen a blanket, belonging to George Vernon, out of Mr. Templar's house, at his sheep-station. The theft was effected during the absence of the hut-keeper: but the prisoner was taken by Constable Connell, with the blanket about him, at Homebush, Mr. Deans's cattle-station, and examined before the Justices on Saturday. He was sentenced by the Resident Magistrate to three months' imprisonment with hard labour.

.Several inhabitants were summoned by the, constables for allowing their cattle to wander at large in the town. Those who did not deny the charge were only made to pay costs, as this is the first time that the Cattle Trespass Ordinance has been enforced here.

James Recce was charged with stealing a jacket belonging to one Warren. It appeared from the evidence that the accused had taken the jacket by mistake for one which he had really lost. He was, therefore, acquitted, with a warning not to run any risk in future, by taking forcible possession even of what he believed to he his own.

The consideration of the cases of those publicans who were not present with their sureties at the Licensing Meeting, in Lyttelton, on the 20th instant, was again postponed to Saturday, the Ist May, at Christchurch, in order that all parties should have full notice.

~There were several cases of debt and damage: but the only one of importance was a claim made by Mr. Thacker upon W. B Bray, Esq., for freight of goods from Lyttelton to Sumner. In August last some goods belonging to Mr. Bray's servants were put on board Mr. Thacker's boat for trans-shipment to Christchurch. The boat was wrecked in the "nook" or " corner" outside Sumner Bar, and only some of the goods saved and collected, by the owners, at that place. Mr. Thacker alleged that this was an unavoidable accident, and claimed £b ss. for freight of the goods to Sumner only. Mr. Bray resisted the demand on the ground of culpable negligence on the part of the seamen, non-delivery of the goods, and non-fulfilment of the contract. The decision of the Magistrates was adjourned till Thursday, in order to procure further evidence as to the conduct of the boatmen.

I have not been able to obtain a complete list of the sides for the intended Cricket Match on Friday; but .you shall have an account of the match next week. Mr. Godley and Mr. Brittan tossed for choice : Mr. Sidebottom and Mr. Wright will bowl on Mr. Godley's side ; Mr. Boys and Dickenson on Mr. Brittan's*

CHURCH CONSTITUTION.

. A meeting of the members of the Church of England was held at St. Paul's School Room, on Wednesday evening, the 7th inst. The meeting having been opened by the Rev. E. Wheeler with prayer, on the motion of Mr. St. Hill, seconded by the Rev. E. Wheeler, Mr. D. Wakefield took the chair.

The chairman having opened the business of the meeting.

Archdeacon Hadfield said he wished, if he should not be considered out of order, to propose an amendment to a resolution, passed at a former meeting, to the effect that a Committee be appointed to petition the Imperial Parliament to grant to the members of the Church of England in New Zealand the necessary powers to manage their own internal affairs. His amendment was, that they should apply to the Colonial Legislature for such powers as they could grant, and if these were found to be insufficient, they could then apply to the Imperial Parliament for such further powers as might be deemed necessary. He could not see why they should not obtain all they wanted from the Colonial Legislature; they required no more than any Banking Company or other society who applied for legal powers to carry out the objects for which they were associated ; if they waited for an enactment by the Imperial Parliament he feared that a long time would elapse before they obtai *ed it.

Mr. Raymond felt great diffidence in differing from the Archdeacon as to the expediency of applying for any powers to the Colonial Legislature. No one could be more anxious than himself to see some form of Church Government established in New Zealand, immediately,

if possible, but he very much feared if they proceeded under any other powers than those given by the Imperial Parliament, they would be setting up a church of their own, and not a branch of the mother church. He should pre-

for submitting to any delay rather than run such a risk, if their application to Parliament was slighted they might then seek for powers elsewhere, but he felt strongly opposed to any alte-

ration being made in the resolution. Archdeacon Hadfield did not see much weight

in Mr. Raymond's objection. In the course he had suggested it was not intended to interfere with anything that would cause a falling off from the Church of England. The English ecclesiastical law was not applicable to New Zealand, and they had therefore nothing to do with it, but the ecclesiastical law was in many ways mixed up with the common law, and so far as it affected them, he imagined a Colonial Legislature could easily provide a remedy. Any act obtained from the Local Legislature would not, of course, be brought into operation until it received the Royal assent, and he must confess he could allow but little weight to the objection made by the previous speaker.

After some further discussion in which Mr. Raymond, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Allen took part, Archdeacon Hadfield said he had no desire that the petition to Parliament should be abandoned, on the contrary, he thought this petition would be strengthened by the recommendation of the Local Legislature; they might in the mean time obtain from the local legislature such powers as they could grant, of the extent of which he was not aware, but which he had no doubt would be sufficient to enable to set matters in train with but little further delay. Sir George Grey said that having recently heard the matter now under discussion talked over in the other settlements, he believe he was correct in stating that the view generally taken in the other settlements was that expressed by the Archdeacon ; at the same time he owned that he was unprepared to express an opinion how far the power of the local legislature extended in the matter. It was a new and very interesting as well as important subiect, and he thought ifcbehoved them to give it all the consideration in their power. He did think, therefore, that it was worth a trial; at any rate it would do no harm to obtain the recommendation of our colonial legislature to the Imperial Parliament to grant the powers required. Mr. Raymond said that after the full and satisfactory discussion that had taken place, he would readily withdraw any opposition to the amendment, as he understood an Act of Parliament would, under any circumstances be applied for. It was then moved by Archdeacon Hadfield, seconded by Mr. St. Hill, the following be added to the original resolution :— That the Committee about to be elected do likewise prepare a memorial to the local legislature to pass an Act upon the same subject. The following gentlemen were elected a Com-

mittee for the above purpose, with power to add to their number:— Mr. D. Wakefield, Mr. Kelham,Mr. Moore, Mr. Brandon, Mr. St. Hill, Capt. Rhodes, Mr. Barraud, Mr. Hickson, Mr. Allen, Mr. Carkeek, Mr. Mills, and Mr. Raymond. It was resolved that the Committee be instructed to add to their number the officiating clergymen of Wellington. Moved by Mr. St. Hill, seconded by Lieut.Colonel M'Cleverty:— That the Committee be instructed to communicate with the other settlements upon the subject of the Church Constitution now under consideration. Sir George Grey thought it would be well if the names of some of the middling and humbler classes of the community were added to the list of the proposed Committee. . Amongst such persons there were many zealous and seriously disposed men, and he was very desirous that in New Zealand the error should be avoided which had been fallen into in America, of making the branch of the Church of England there established the church of the rich. He could not but think that great good would result from enlisting the sympathies of all classes in the cause which they had in hand. Mr. Allen was very glad to hear such sentiments from his Excellency, and regretted that these views had not always been acted on.

Archdeacon Hadfield' then addressed the meeting on the subject of the franchise, and adverted to a report of Mr. Godley's speech at a meeting at Christchurch, which he had that day read in the New Zealand Spectator. He

had a high opinion of Mr. Godley, yet he could not but think that, gentleman was too stringent in the terms laid down by him, when he "proposed that none but communicants should exercise the franchise. He differed materially with him on that subject. Mr. Godley appeared to think that the subject had not been properly considered by those persons at Wellington who had taken the lead in this matter, in error on that point, for he (the knew that the opinions of the Bishop of New Zealand, and those of Mr. Martin coincided with his own with reference to this subject. Itwas his opinion that all were members of the f Christian Church by baptism, and he thought "'"" that, however desirable it might be to have a high standard before them, it would not be found prudent in an infant colony to lay down a rule so stringent as that he had adverted to.

Sir George Grey said it was a mistake to suppose that the question of church membership in New Zealand had not been care fullyconsidered, and that for a period of nearly four years. In considering this subject it was hardly necessary to consider what other Protestant denominations regarded as constituting membership. Their governing bodies did not consist of an Episcopal Chamber, a Chamber of Clergymen, aud one of Laymen ; the joint consent of all of which was necessary for-the enactment of any law binding upon the whole Church. Where the governing body was thus composed of three Chambers, it did not appear that so high a standard of qualification was necessary to enable a lay member of the church to give a vote in favour of a delegate to the Cham >erof Laymen.

The Church of England received into its bosom

by baptism two classes of persons, rendering them thereby members of Christ's Church— adults and infants. Surely no adult would be thus admitted into the Church until he was qualified to give a vote in favour of a delegate to the Lay Chamber. Surely under so active a system of Church Government as was proposed, the Church itself would take care that thos^N

infants adopted into it by baptism should receive such an education as would qualify thifih. to exercise their rights as church members. But if persons belonging to either of these classes were such unworthy persons as to be incapable and undeserving of exercising their privileges as church members, the church itself, under the proposed system of government, would have the power of excluding such persons from the privilege of voting; in this case punishment would fall only on those who deserved .it; and the church would not be driven into adopting a system.of qualification of church membership, which might lead to many abuses, and must certainly open many very difficult questions. In America, in addiiion to baptism, the qualification of renting sittings in the church was required. It was found that this to a great extent excluded the poor from the Church of England, and drove them to other denominations. This was a subject of regret to many of the wisest men connected with that church.

Here it had been proposed, in addition to baptism, to require as a qualification the payment of a small annual sum for the support of the church. It was proposed that this sum should be so small that the poorest person in the country could pay it, and by this means, in as far as church membership went, acquire all the privileges which the richest man could gain. No doubt it was to be hoped that every member of the church would become a communicant; one of the very objects of the proposed system of church government was to raise the church

to this standard, and he (Sir George Grey) hoped that it would in time be attained to ; but he confessed lie felt averse to see anything like. _,'"s. reward or special privilege being given to-per-sons for receiving the communion. When, however, the proposed form of church govj-u-s*/. ment was established, the church itself could

make laws, by which, as good members of the

church, they would all be equally bound, and then, no doubt, the subject of the qualification requisite to constitute church membership would be considered more fully by a large number of persons who had not yet attended to the subject.

The proceedings of the meeting were then concluded by prayer.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT18520515.2.17

Bibliographic details

Lyttelton Times, Volume II, Issue 71, 15 May 1852, Page 8

Word Count
2,234

CHRISTCHURCH. Lyttelton Times, Volume II, Issue 71, 15 May 1852, Page 8

CHRISTCHURCH. Lyttelton Times, Volume II, Issue 71, 15 May 1852, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert