Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MONETARY DISCUSSION.

(To the Editor). Sir, —Two pens have already so ably exposed the main fallacy in Dr. Fisher’s criticism that further discussion .on that point is quite unnecessary, but the Doctor adds fallacy to fallacy. In the first place, Captain Rushworth wrote the Minority _ Report, a D.S.C. report, ’not a Socialistic report as Dr. Fisher apparently hoped for, and the Labour Party accepted it after a caucus meeting. If a bare majority report can be said to refute anything, and it did not even answer the D.S.C. proposals, it certainly did not refute the “Guernsey Islanders” as they at least built their hall free of debt, which is more than our Government can do under the present system. —I am, etc., HEATH MASON.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KCC19350202.2.45.1

Bibliographic details

King Country Chronicle, Volume XXIX, Issue 4652, 2 February 1935, Page 5

Word Count
125

THE MONETARY DISCUSSION. King Country Chronicle, Volume XXIX, Issue 4652, 2 February 1935, Page 5

THE MONETARY DISCUSSION. King Country Chronicle, Volume XXIX, Issue 4652, 2 February 1935, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert