THE MONETARY DISCUSSION.
(To the Editor). Sir, —Two pens have already so ably exposed the main fallacy in Dr. Fisher’s criticism that further discussion .on that point is quite unnecessary, but the Doctor adds fallacy to fallacy. In the first place, Captain Rushworth wrote the Minority _ Report, a D.S.C. report, ’not a Socialistic report as Dr. Fisher apparently hoped for, and the Labour Party accepted it after a caucus meeting. If a bare majority report can be said to refute anything, and it did not even answer the D.S.C. proposals, it certainly did not refute the “Guernsey Islanders” as they at least built their hall free of debt, which is more than our Government can do under the present system. —I am, etc., HEATH MASON.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KCC19350202.2.45.1
Bibliographic details
King Country Chronicle, Volume XXIX, Issue 4652, 2 February 1935, Page 5
Word Count
125THE MONETARY DISCUSSION. King Country Chronicle, Volume XXIX, Issue 4652, 2 February 1935, Page 5
Using This Item
Waitomo Investments is the copyright owner for the King Country Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Waitomo Investments. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.