Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

A husband and wife differed about the ownership of a 28-day clock, and finally had to appear in Court to settle the matter. The Judge said it was quite obviously a case of joint ownership, and decreed that the wife should have the clock and the husband the 28 days!

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KCC19320719.2.46

Bibliographic details

King Country Chronicle, Volume XXVI, Issue 3395, 19 July 1932, Page 6

Word Count
50

Untitled King Country Chronicle, Volume XXVI, Issue 3395, 19 July 1932, Page 6

Untitled King Country Chronicle, Volume XXVI, Issue 3395, 19 July 1932, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert