RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Inangahua Times, Issue 51, 3 July 1878, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Wednbbdax 2Gxtt Juku, 1878, (Boforo E. Shaw, Esq., E.M.). lUitub? v Clotoiid. Upon tho Court resuming, Mr Reid called bin Worahip'a nttontion to tho , ordor mado on tho provious dny that nil witnosfoa should loavo tho. Court until called upon, Ho noticod Mr Davios was prosonl; in Court. Counsel horo rosumod hi» scat, Tho witnoaa at 111 remaining in Court, Mr Roid nokod tho Bonoh to ordor Mr Dnvios to. loavo tho CourMiouoo which wnM dono, Wnl tor Brown— l nm ledger lcoopor at tho Bank of Now Zonland, Itoofton, I produoo a ohoquo drawn by John Daw« son, datod llth Außiwt, 1877, in favor of Deflanco shnros or boaror for J&24. I cannot flay to whom it waa paid. Tho following aro tho grounds of dofonco uj on which tho forogoing ovidonoo was adduced :— 1. That tho nllogod libol was a privi» logod communioation. • 2. That it wns a fair oommont on tho prooocdingß of a Court of Juhtiao with, n view to investigating a tnattor in whicli tho dofondant bad an intorost. ft, That tho statements madd by tho dofondant woro boliovod to be truo by him. 4 Thnd thoy wo.ro mado in dofcnoo of fchn dofcndonlfi ri«h(fl and intcrcnto, and that it was for tho public bonnftt that suoh otatomontH should bo publishod. 5. That tho Htatomonts mado woro justified by thoir truth. Wo givo bolow tho continuation of tho evidence given in tho abovo oaso. j WUMiRW Brown Archer— l wag üblmxcq

holder in tho Dofinnco Company ; I hold ]0()0 shares ,; I recollect tlio litigation in the .District Court between tho company uml Bnkoi 1 , and othors.,. find rnnollool; a conversation taking place after tho salo of tho property, botweon Dnvios, Mirfin, nnd myself ; it took place in Dawson'a Hotol, and rofor'rod to llio salo of Iho Defiance Claim ; I nuked nbout my shnros and Mirfin said if I applied to Davios ho would put mo in tlio way of clotting thorn at 4d ; Davios then carao in i shnros woro worth nothing thon ; boforo tho proporty was sold, I sold somo eihnvos in tho Doll* anoo for G* Gd ; this wag somo two or throo months boforo tlio salo of tho claim i I appliod for 1400 flharos in fcho Victory Company, paid for thorn nnd got thorn * I paid did for thorn j I appliod to Raithby for thorn by lottor ; I bolioyo I wroto tho lottor in Dnvio's oftloo, nud I got a tranofor ; had n conversation with Dnvios, Mirftn, nnd Rancor on tho day of tho , gonoral meeting ; I was annoyed at tho manner in which tho snlo had boon earn riod out by tho directors, nnd mndo tho remark thai; if thoro wan a swindle, why should I not bo in it, as I was ono of tho original Bharoholclors. This took pined outfiido tho oOloo ; I was informod of tho salo to [It.ftilhby for £500 ; I did not up* provo of tho fialo, I did not oonsidor £500 a fair prioo for tho mine ; I got Cs Cd n Hcrip for korao of myohares nnd oonsidor tho property is worth 6s Od per scrip. I wna annoyed, and tho directors did not scent to onro to givo mo any informalion, so I opoko to aomo of tho shareholders ; I boliovo tho proporty was sold out and out, or I should not havo paid llailhby for what I bought in tho Victory Company; I havo road tho lcttor signed ' Charlos Clifford/ and consider its contents grossly libellous. His Worship— Do you oonaidor front fflQta within your own knowledge tint the Htatomonts eoninjncd in tho lottor, aro justified upon tlio ground of truth. VVilnoas— l any (hat no mnn isontitlod to writo such a lottor,, unless ho is ablo to provo n connpiracy. Tho Bonolv— Tlio question, is. do you consider from facts within your own know* ledgo, that defendant in roferring to what 1 ho dosoribos ns n conspiracy wan nponking tho truth. Witncsfi— -I cannot say, I was an* noyed nt tho action of tho directors, and did thon uso tho expression of ' swindle,' Tho Bench-— Do you boliovo from any fnots within your own knowledge, that tho dafendnnt in alleging n conspiracy botwoen Rnithby, .Dnvion, Mirfin, nnd Guinness, bolicvod in tho truth of what ho wroto P Witnos'i— ,T do not consider that do* fondant w.m justified by any faot a within my own knowledge }?y Mr .VCoas ; ; Do you know of nny shareholders thatDuvios, Mirfin, llailhby nnd Guinness havo defrauded P Witnoso . How can I know of nny n.liaro« holders that Davios, Mirfin, nnd Raithby hnvo dofrnudod P Tho Bench : Do you know why tho olaim was sold. Witness •■ Yes, I boliovo from gonoral conversation/) that it wiui sold to nave lili* gnlion of clftims brought against tho company,, but I don't know this from m oaw knowlodgo. Tho Bench : Do you oonsidor that tlo salo of tho.mino to Raithby for £500 was a fair nnd honost transaction. Witness : I do not. I considor tho proporty was undersold. Tho Bench ; You said just now that tho proporty was sold out nnd out; was it a morn beneficial arrangomont P Witness : Not to my knowlodgo, but I thought it could havo boon, disposod of to bottov advantage By tho Bench : Mr Mirfin told mo thnt Raithby had got tho proporty at n nominal price, and I thought it paid him very well. Tho Bench : You said just now that you valued your sharos at fl» 0 ', aro thoro nny foots within your knowlodgo that could doprociato the shares to twopence. Witness: Tho litigntion would dopro* cintotho sharos, but Iflihinlc it would not doprcoiato it to £500. The Bench ; Do you not think thnt 4d for tho Victory shnros wna a moroly nominal prico P Witness : It was all that was nuked. Tho Bench ; You say thnt boforo tho litigation you valued your shnros at (5s Od; you thon hoard that tho proporty had boon sold against your wish Cor £500 and thoro* foro you do not consider that 41 wna a more nominal prico P What woro shares worth immodiatoly boforo tho salo. Witness i Thoy woro worth 4s just boforo tho frnlo. Tho ltonch : If tho whole, of tho 24,000, shnros woro Rold for £500 that would bo only 8d por shnro ; do you know of anything thnt would doprociato tho valuo of the proporty to that exlont P Witness j Nothing but tho lnvsuih Tho Bonoh i Do you say- thon that tho. proporty was sacrificed P Witness s Cortainly. 0. F. Allen Broad—l am nocountant in. tho National Bank of Now Zoaland, Limited, Reofton. I rccoivod a flubpcona to produco certuiu documents. Tho bill I am summoned to produco has boon lakon out of tho Bankj I know of ihe existence of Riioh a bill for £500, it is ncooptod by llailhby. Rnithby rotirod tho bill by chpque,. Mr Hoid nskod tho > witness whother Mirfiu or Davics asfiiatcd to meet tho bill,

Mi 1 Moa.'i ol'jnctod to tho question. TTifi Worship suggested thai; the <l'i«s» tion should bo put as to whether .Kaithby wan assisted in meeting tho bill. Mr Mosm objected to tiu question being put in any way oxoopt " whether it wan mot by Hnithby." His Worship said tho word " conspiracy " waa very comprohonsivo nnd tho transnofcton in question was part of tho voe.gosto, and iWofor© allowed tho quos« tion, Examination oontinuod — I am not nwaro that llaithby was nasisted in mooting tho bill by oifchor Mirfin, Dnvios, or Guinness. Tho bill was in favor of tho Do/ianoo Company" Knithby would arvnngo with tlio Manager about the roliromont of the bill. Mr Itcid } Was llnithby's nocount in credit fit tho timo P Mr Moss objected. Mr Roid said if tho transition wns an honest one why uood tho olhor sido sock to hush up tho mattor, His Worship ruled that tho question could not bo put in iho form BngßOslpcl. Examination continued — I don't ro| member any sum of £95 which vyas chnrgod to Mirfin and Tilbrook'.s hanoi'tnt with roforonoo to tho ■Kill, I hnven't any. recollection, I dotftvjkaw of; any bucl| sum. ' Audrow Agnow Morttoith — I nm ma:ia»; got- of tho National Bnnk, llcofton, . ' Mr Moid asked vvhothcr tho witness know of a bill of £500 by Itnilliby to tho Dofianoo Company. Mr Moss objectorl, but was ovorrnlod. Examination continued— l know that fiuoh a bill existed. I havo reason to bo*| lievo it wns in tho bank. 1 never Raw tho bill. I was not tho manager at tho time.' It was retired before I took tho manage* monl, Mr Hold— Did cither Mirlin, Davies, or Kaithby assist to moot tho bill. Mr Moss objoolod. Thoßonoh— lf tho bill was paid by Jlaithby, and tho proceeds distributed as, a dividend amongst tho shareholders it does not matter who nssislod Kuithby to provido funds for tho bill. Mr lloid 1 No, but if wo can provo that tho claim was sold at ono eigh its value ; that a bill takon for tho purchase monoy, and if wo provodthat tho director of tho company provided funds to moot tho bill, tho ovidonco would jioto connect linithby, Mirfin nnd Davies in tho transaction. Tho Monch— Tho salo of Iho mino for £500, nnd tho mooting of tho bill nro two distinct mnttors. Mr lloid oontondod ihnt thoy woro ins eoparnblo. Somo further argument onsueil k and Mr Reid ooncludod by saying that tho Bench and himself wcro directly at issuo upon Iho point, but after Iho < remarks which had fallen from Inn Worship ho (Mr Ueid) would not urgo themaltor lurlhor, though sjlill maintaining his oontontion, ]i)xamination continued— l received n Bubpocona to produoo all tho buolta and jmporti in tho ensq I <lo not produoo thorn. Tbo transaction passed through oi^ht or ton books ; I can prodt'eo tho bank bill book if tho Uonoh orders it. Hift Worship said it would bo imposaiblo to. produce tho wholo of tho Hank boolui, Tho dofonco could require tho production of any particular book or books. Mr Moss objocted, MrEoid said ho only required tho books ooulniujng entries of tho bill in question, and not all tho bank books. His Worship— r.Dd<m. tho B.mlc lodger show llnithby's account ? Witness : Tho Bank lo.lgor would not show that. His Worship : Ts there any book in tho JJnnk that would show what paymonls woro made for that bill. Witness ! The lodger would show that, but would noli aJidw tho sources of tho monoy. 1 1 if) Worship : It ia allogod by tlio defonoo that tho wholo bill was a sham, nnd thoy want ovidenoo to show that fact. Mr lioid, would tho paynin alips not show who tho money onnio from. Witness : It would bo a tnattor of groat inoonvonienco for, )no to produce tho bank books and papora. Hio Worship ruled thai; all ovidenoo connorning tho firfanoial relations of tho bill was inadmissdblo, Mr Koid profestod thnt ovidonoo to filiow that tho dii'oolors providod monoy to moot tho bill was admissnblo, and os* sonlial to tho proof of Iho dofonoo. • His Worship said that fraud could bo inforrod from tho inndequnto prico of tho mino, but tho ovidonco relating to tho pnyment of tho bill was not rolovant. Louis Davioa— l wns mannger of Iho Dofianoo Company. I do not produce tho shavo register of tho Company. I havo not rocoivod any oubpoona. Mr IJoid— Havo you not recoived a subpeona to produco cortain books and dooumonts. Witness s No In roply to tho Bonoh Mr Lucna said tho subpoonns had boon nppliod for, but thoro had not yet boon timo to. issuo and sorvo thorn." Tho oano was ilion adjournod until tho following day. William M'Loan— l rocolloot a nalo of Dofianco shnroa nt my mart on tho llth of August last. Tho numbor put uj) by mo was 500. Thoy bolonged to ono party but I put thorn up in 100 a, with Iho option of tho lot. lam quito cortain of the duto. From a rcforeuQC to my sajo«

book and also to tho advertisement ; I ' fi in able to say thai I offered them on tho day named. I was allowed a spo-l deal of latitude, and to go between 5s and (5s an.l as much morons 1 could Ret, I should not hnvo lot tliom go for loss than 5s Thesollor was Mr Bayfoilti, niul ho snid ho wni» r propnrod to Ruocr n considerable loss in lotting thorn go at tho prico slatodj I think tbo highost gonuino offer was ss. tho shares wero thon withdrawn By Iho Court— l think tho nhnros woro bought in nt Ds ; I am certain that I got a genuino bid for ovor 4s for tho shores. I saw Mr Mirfin boforo I oflbrcd tho sorip Tho pluoo was crowded and I sold a groat number of sbnroa on that day ; I had just about conimonccd tho salo when I saw Mirfin in tho room. It was the largest ftharo sale I Imvo ovor hold in lloofton ; I oflbrod about 11,000 shares for salo in all. Mirfin handed mo up a small memorandrnn. JIo had groat difficulty in reaching mo ; I 3iiw him ontor and could soo that ho wanted to come to mo,, and watched him elbow his way to mo. Ho hold u memorandum in his hand and Rave it to mo, I road tho momo and destroyed it. Tho purport of tho memorandum was that 2000 flharos in tho Defiunco Company hud just boon sold in Dawson's Hall, for' I boliove, 3d by Mr Koevos, by public nuclion. I am quilo certain tho sum stulod was not more than 3d ; I was ho stunned whon I read tho memo* randum; thut I was in doubt as to whether I should oiler my lot of J)ofianco shares, it had a very sorious effect upon my mind as from my inatruotions from IkyfoiM, and my own knowledge, I was under tho belief that I could sell readily.and wi;s nfraid thorolbro, that I could not malco my commission on tho salo. Mr Hayfoild howovor, boing in tho room, I did offer thorn, I thought tho salo atDawson's wis a sham and I think I acquainted tho public of that sole. I certainly did not think that 3d wns a fair prico for the shnros, and am confi.lont that they would havo brought moro at auction. Shares woro thon saloablo at ss. I had a largo attondanco and a brisk salo. I thought at tho time that 53 was uo prico for tho shares. 1 havo road tho Inangatiua Times whilo in Dunedin, and having again just hoard tho libel roforrod to read, I don't know of my own knowlodgo that Mirfin, Duvios, nnd Kaithby, entered into a conspiracy to dofraud cortain shuro* holders in tho I >o(innco Company. Cross-osaminod by Mr Moss— My clerk mado memorandum of tho sale at my mi\rt on tho dato named. Hud I been offered over 5s for tho shares, I should havo lot them go. After (ho snlo, Mirfin asked mo if tho Defiance shares w< re hone fido Hold; I said it was not a hona fide fiiilo, but that it mado no difference to mo that I could get my commission. I moan by Iho word hona fido tint the sharos wcro not siold. Thoy word hona ■fido in my Irmds for salo up to ss. iUo-examined by Mr .Weid— Clifford has often told mo that Iho mino salo wns a swindle, ami I believe that ho thought tho Halo was a swindle, and Cully believes ir. Iho truth of whuG ho wrote. H« honafida bcliovca that tho salo at Dawson's was n sham, uiul I believo tho same- I coul I not account for Mirfin's anxiety to no quaint, mo with Iho result of tho sale at Dawson's. Tho salo at Dawson's took plaoo almost at tho sumo timo as my salo, and I thought that of itself was strange. William Lynch— l am a minor and was a shareholder in tho Defiance Company and was also a director of tho company. I hold 1000 shares ; 1 was working in the mine. 1 went to work about Sop tembcr 1875, and was there on nnd off till August 1870. I knocked off in oonsoquvycoof tho diflluulty of i;ol|ing tho nails in. Arranged with Davies, tho manager of tho company that I should lenoek off for a month, to soo if wo could got tho back culls in. About ton daya aflerDnvios sent a man to mo demanding tho koys of Iho hut. I gavo him tho koys but told him that ho would havo to go to work at his own risk, as thoro was no monoy to pay him. Ho said ho had mado arrangements with Dnvios nnd would go to work. Did not soo Dnyio* for four or fivo wpoks after, and ho was rftlho'r cross with mo* Wo had a, falling out bocauso I had boon to- tho bant to onqtiiro about tho company's account ; I found out Hint two bad cheques had boon paid in, ono by Archer, and tho olhor by Mirfin. Ho said I had no right to go to tho bunk. I said thab as n diroctor of tho company, it was my duty to mako tho enquiries. Saw him again about Iho 18th INovombor, 1870, nnd nsked him to sell 500 shares for mo, as I was going to Boatman's, and tola 1 him that ho could soil them for tho calls duo on thorn, and told him I was going to work in tho Hopeful nnd to let mo know if ho could sell them, and I would know what to do. I said I intended to Icocp 500 shares, an I had paid so much into tho mino. I onmo to Koofton about January following, and wont to Davio's olork (Tourrottos) about my shnros ; I hoard a rumour that my sharos had boen. sold ; I left iho Clerk and wont to Davioa nnd nsked him if all my sharos woro sold, and ho said thoy woro, all ot thorn. Ho snid thoy had boon sold for calls ; I folt surprised at that ; I had rocoivod no nolico whatever to pay calls ; I think I told him that it was unjust to soil my shares for tho calls when many other shareholders owod four or fivo calls. £8 Gs 8d was nil that wns duo on my shares at tho timo they wcro nllegcd to to sold 3, 1 did not

consider the snlo of my sh;ir»\s was a legal, ono ; I bclicvo tbnt liad f not, gone lo the JJiiulf and mado inquiries about tho Company's allairs my shares would novor Imvo boon sold. They woro sold becnuso of tbo row with Dnyins; uftor «oinjx to tbo Bank I novcr nltcndod nnothor mcotiiu? iiooanso 1 could sno that it was no good ; tho lost mooting I attended was I think Jiino, 1876 ; I was never informed of tbo salo of tho property by tho Company ; I could not say what tho vnluo of my shares was nt tho tinio I wont to Bont» mon's 09 thoro wus n jiood dcnl of davk work goiDR on nt tho timo ; could havo pot 6s 6d for tbo shnros last August; ; I dont think I was n director »t tho timo my shnros wcro sold ; I did not ask for a snio note of my shares, nor did not rr« coivoono; novor fiofc n bnlnnco ; boni-d that tho shares brought £17 odd j novor got a notico from the compnuy statnm th»t my shnres would bo sold on a cort«ii> dnto unless rodoomod. Tho shnrel\oldcrs who owed more tlmn I did when I was a director wero Archer; Mirfin, Wilson, nnd mnny others. Tins I know of my own knowledge a* n dircotor of tho company ; I consider tho snlo of thn mino for £»O) was n very dishonest ono. At tho timo tlio propo'rty wns sold 1 had tnlcen pro* ooedinßS to rocovor my shares ; I think my case wns oillcd on for henriug in tho l)istrict Court, Keefton, on tho dny of Iho snle of thn mine. Tho snlo was of" foctod (o dofrruitl us out ot oviv »>bnroo ; I flnnnot soo nny othor motive for tbo sale. Hnk<M\ Onllm^nn, j*»; ■Dowal.llynn, Nynll nnd Kfcnan worn 00-plnin tills with mo in the case roforrod to. ITnvo rend the al* logod libel, nnd having ;ij; ( *i n just; benrd tho paragraph fomplninod of rond, nnd from tlio fnnls within my own knowledge, I nm of opinion that Duvio-, Mirlin, nnd Knilhby, nonspirol lo^olluu' to dcfinud us of our inlorostH, Cross-oxiiminod l»y Mr Moin—T think I owodlwoono penny cnlls nt the limn my shares woro forfoitod. A third call l>iul boen mndo, bnt it wns not duo, ns thoro wns 2L days boforo it beonmo pnynblo. By tho Court— T know »ho proper proceduro to bo Mlowod in drnlitur with forfoitod shnros. 1 wentyono eloar days must elapse, and tho salo must bo advertised, nnd I must recoivo nolico of tbo intended salo. Louis Dnvios— l received a notice to pvnfbico n transfer to John Dnwsm of 20(X) slinros ; T produce tbo transfer. It shows tbnti ou llth August I transferred to John Duvvson 2000 shnres in tho Pollnnoo Compnuy. Tho consideration stated is,i'2s; I received that sum loss commission nnd expenses ; 1 bnvo tbo Pofiuioo Compnny's books horo, but no authority to prortuno them unloss orderod. Mr Reid asked that tho wi'noss should be ordered to produeo tliom. His Woruliip ordered tho prochrtion of tho books. Exnminntioti rontimioi]— l produeo tbo olinro ro;?istcr of tlio DoOnnoo Company j _ tlio fiuuroi* in tbo rogiHtor nro in my handwriting ; I fiml a-i on try tlioroin of transfer- to Dnwsoii, dutod 17tU Außiist 5 I ounnofc *tuto why tho Ivanafcr brnrs clufco lltb August nnd tho rovtietor tho 17th AuRU-t ; I don't know why tho clißVrnnoo occunocl ; tho usuul custom is to on tor trnn«for in rojr'utoi' on rluto of voei>ipf, I wii9 loanl mnnngpi" of tli» T)<<flnnoo Company nt tlio timo of the nnlo to Dawson. A« tho puller of I ho flhnvos, or othor wiso, I know of no nmsou wl»7 tlio tnnmfoi- was not rennterivl on llio tiny of riilo. Tomy !<nowl«ulgot.ho<o flinvn.i Inul novor boen transferred out. of tho ro^istor itf. \\\n flnto of tho winding up of tlio DcfiaiuM ooni)>nnv, tbo shiroM romninod in Dow^on'.* name. In piving Pnwflort tho traunfor, I jiartod with nil nty ihtorost in tho sbaros ; I was quite Putiafiod with !)cl for thorn, nn<l woul I Imvo boon Rind to got; rid of v low morn Hiousan'!a at the mum flguro. j fiy tho Court— T inntrueNul ltoovon to coll ; I piita rosorvn of 3-1 on tho snip. Tho milo wftcon tho ll'h August, but I instructed, him beforo that j I onn't any whothor tho milo wnt ndvortisod } I did not nttondtho enl"; I did'i t know that Ucovos wns goins to soil nt Mint prirticnlar timo > I wno anxious to get tho best possible) prioo for thorn. Bonch : If you had boon told that by going n littlo bighor up Iho fltronfc you could got -U for your slmmn, by honn fldo biddot I*,1 *, would you still think tll'tt you obrainod tho bost possihlo prico for your shnrcs P Witness : I was nt that plaoo and thoro wns no milo. liottoh : Aro you nwsivc of tho ovidrtnoo of Bnyfoild, Cuplos and M'Loan, upon tho sub* Witness: I honrd tho shares knocked down at i*, but it wan no salo. I swear this distinctly Bonoh : Then if Mr MTjonn lm<) sworn and this after i-ofroshini" his memory liy roforonoo to bin notes nnd snlo book, that; he ofVnrod tho share? Bonn lido for enlo and re* t oivod gonuino bids ovor 4s j nnd in tho fnoo of Mr Cnplo'o ovidonco that at that sulo ho wns proparod to givo Gs for tho shnros, both of those witnosscm havo swor.i to what is falsn P Witness i I know that ho snid 4* Thoro was no buyer dcolnvod Bench : Mr M'Loan baa sworn that n. resorvo of 5s wns put upon tho shares, and that ho obtained bona fldo bids over 4s, and knocked thorn down to n dummy \ nro you properod to swonrthnfc that is faUoP witness s I am prrparod to swear that ho might have boon ollorod 100, but his words woro 4» Bench t Thon Mr M'Lonn has sworn to what in untrue P Witness: I am not proparod to ewoar that Benoli : Did you considor that by nllowinf; Hooves to aoll your flhnrofi without duo publicity, iv a voom with only Dawson prosent, thnt you woro oudoavoring to obtain the bost prieo for your shares P Witness : I novor honrd that tho salo wns to take plnoe nt thnt pnrtioulu; timo Bonch: Do you think so now P Witness : Do I think so now P [Tho Bench ropoatod tho quostion] Witnoss : Woll, I novor . instructed Reovos how to noil, oithor by publio auction or pri» vatoly, but simply told him if ho oould got a buyor, to soil Bench : Tho quostion is, do you now oonsidoi* that you obtained tho boat possiblo prieo for your shares P Witnoss :■ X oould not say i I wns perfectly satisfied, and would liavo boen glad to soil all my interest at tbo samo figure Bonch: Notwithstanding that you oould hnvo got ilftcon or sixtcou times as much andthat nnothor auotionoor could got that for thorn P Witnosfl : Ho could not do it. lioncli : You havo already statod that M'Loan got -I* P Witnesa : But I oould not judge whothor that was genuino unless I knew tho pnrtioa wht; put up and bought Iho share*. I thought the tmlo \\M a tsham, Bonoh : Thoy worn surely worth wha thoy would lotoh at tho time, and Mr Oaplon has awovii t.hut ho was propurod to buy at ■is or overt

Ih' i\: -si 1 u hi * !u . i ,i i( iir 1 1 1 .! si :' ! !'...'.• duy (yiv-'lri'iliiy), Uui; lit.) • "-jr i«;L n -*i- »j 1 ul" ill tividoiii'o 1.1 liold ovit,