BUTLER v. BAYFEILD.
[to the editor inangahua times.] Snt, — The Herald of yesterday in a londnr stiyn in reference to the abovi! ease that '' Biibetiintiol justice has boon done; between tho parties." go fur goo 1 , nnd tho general impression is to flint eff.efc. But the anine paper i* undoubti dly in error when it goes on to say that ihoo whs a loi-g chnin of evidence tending '*lo show that Twohill of whatever oharaetcr the pegging might liavo been, first pegged out the ground." To say nothing of the numerous points on which Twoliill wtis flatly contradicted by credible witnesses, it cimnot be denied that Butler (admittedly a truthful witness) save posilirc evidence as to time, whilo Twoiiil'.s unreliable eviflenen, was as r'giirdd tithe, mere guess work, if even ho ever pegged tlfo grouud at all- I u>H ( ghid , tho A lessors names have been given in tho t report of tho cnse, <is any one interested in , ] rnariiug tlio report will be able to judge ol (ho I ability of thoso gentlemen to assist tho 1 1 W»rden iv acuse of this nature, Yotrn's &c», i W. S. StaitU. i
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/IT18771102.2.6.2
Bibliographic details
Inangahua Times, Volume IV, Issue 90, 2 November 1877, Page 3
Word Count
192BUTLER v. BAYFEILD. Inangahua Times, Volume IV, Issue 90, 2 November 1877, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in