SUEZ CANAL
AN AWKWARD PROBLEM
LONDON, Sep. 10
One of the many) awkward problems that arose from the collapse and deiec. tion of France was the control of the Suez Canal, which, while an international. waterway, has been virtually the property of a wealthy -and powerful French company since its opening 71 vears ago. Ignoring Mussolini's claims (now left to the arbitrage of war), the canal has been , the concern of three countries, France, Egypt, and Britain. France engineered and built it, and holds the bulk of the shares. She has a clear majority on the board of directors of the company that holds the concession, provides the registered headquarters, and nearly all the administrative staff.
Egypt owns the territory and the canal has to be handed over to her in 1968 in good condition in return for compensation still to be determined. Britain, who is responsible for the defence of the canal, provides the bulk of the traffic, holds .a large proportion of the shares, -and nominates ten directors.
For the time, being however, the French-controlled board of directors ceases to have any say in the running of the canal, and Britain and Egypt have assumed full responsibilitiy. Meetings of the board are now in abeyance There are 32 directors--19 French, ten British, two Egyptian, and one Dutch, each receiving between £3OOO and £SOOO a year, plus generous expenses, for their services. Since the fall of Paris and the surrender of France, the British directors — three re presenting the Government and seven the shipping companies—have been unable to get into touch with their French colleagues, and have no idea how they will line up under Petain’s Government, though the views of Gen. real Weygand, a comparative newcomer to the board, are. well enough known now. Most of the others are believed to be intensely pro-l:iritish, including M. Edgar Bonnet (a Knight of the Order of the British Empire), one of the vice-presidents and father of M. George Edgar Bonnet, general manager; of the company. Pro-Britisli sentiments may not he allowed to count for much in the new France, and there is a certain amount of anxiety that outside efforts may bo. made to lay. claim to assets and re-, serves of the company held in Paris, which amount to some millions of pounds. The only- recent pronouncement of the company was that the payment of dividends has been suspended, but this was only-to be expected, when war restrictions on trade and the closing of the Mediterranean have reduced traffic - through the Canal to a fraction of its previous- volume. -N° share quotations have been recorded sine l Italy’s entry into the war gave the final blow to traffic via Suez. For the first time in the 71 years, that have elapsed since de Lesseps achieved his engineering triumph France and Paris have practically no say in the control of the canal. The British Navy, other armed forces, and the Egyptian Government are in possession on the spot, and the two Governments have reached a financial arrangement, guaranteed by London and short-circuiting Paris, under which the administrative staff (nearly all French) will continue to be paid and the effective working of the waterway maintained as effectively as war permits.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19400917.2.8
Bibliographic details
Hokitika Guardian, 17 September 1940, Page 2
Word Count
539SUEZ CANAL Hokitika Guardian, 17 September 1940, Page 2
Using This Item
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.