LOSS OF LEAGUE FOOTBALLERS

Hokitika Guardian, 10 December 1929, Page 6

LOSS OF LEAGUE FOOTBALLERS

VIEW OF ENGLISH AUTHORITIES. AUCKLAND, December 7. The engagement of outstanding New Zealand 'footballers by the English Rugby League clubs, especially in view of last season’s experience, created considerable concern in Auckland, and, at the instance of the, New Zealand Rugby League’s clubs, the council protested against a practice that robbed the Dominion of star players, and strengthened clubs which were already powerful financially to the detriment of other English clubs. In addition to sending a strong protest, the New Zealand Council deputed .the of the Australian League team, now in England, to place the seriousness of the position, on behalf of both Australia and New Zealand, before the annual conference of English clubs. The council dealt with the matter at a recent meeting. :

The secretary of the English Rugby League, in acknowledging receipt of Qie New Zealand council’s representations, advised that a circular ; as requested, had been issued to all clubs. New Zealand, it was stated was asking for a re-imposition of the ban on colonial players which after prolonged agitation by clubs and individuals, had been removed. The matter was finally in the hands of the clubs, whose views would have to lie carried out by the Englislv Council, on which the clubs had delegates. “The council itself is not prepared at the moment to throw the whole question into the melting pot,” the English secretary said, “being of the opinion that the present system, after a year or two, will prove conclusively that it is the best for all parties concerned. The ban was a gross interference with the liberty of the subject. The long distance between your good solves and us, coupled with the heavy expense attached to bringing plavers from New Zealand to England, will always act as a sufficient deterrent. AYe think that once the present system has been given a chance and settled down you will find little ground for complaint.” A communication from the Hull Club dated October 30, stated that the directors had considered the appeal made by the New Zealand League. “We sympathise with' your league, and agree with the sentiments expressed in your letter,” the secretary advised, “and you can rely upon the support of our representatives when the matter is discussed again.” The chairman (AL Cyril Snedden) said it was no use dealing with the matter until the return of the Australian team, which might bring further information. Tn the meantime replies inivitt come from other clubs. This course was approved, and the letter received.