Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ABRAMS TREATMENT

DR. MACKENZIE'S AI'PEAT

FURTHER, ARGUMENT

[by TELEGRAPH —PF.lt PttFSS ASSOCIATION.] WELLINGTON. July 10. Continuing bis argument in the Mackenzie appeal, Mr Myers said blood tests were made by machine, and lie would admit Mackenzie was wrong in pinning bis faith entirely to the machine to the exclusion of other methods. He considered the undertaking by him not to use the machine In tuture, except, as a cheek upon usual clinical methods, would lie sufficient, and this is what he had lieen doing since the report of the Hordcr Commission. Mackenzie's chief mistake was his faith ill his own capability, which evidently was not as great as he thought. Since he returned from America, the doctors in Auckland had been watching to get, evidence against him.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19250710.2.35

Bibliographic details

Hokitika Guardian, 10 July 1925, Page 3

Word Count
127

ABRAMS TREATMENT Hokitika Guardian, 10 July 1925, Page 3

ABRAMS TREATMENT Hokitika Guardian, 10 July 1925, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert