Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BETA CETI.

(By *..P.G.)

The Press Association's message, m Tuesday's Star, originating from Mr J. T. Ward, director of the Wanganui Observatory, to the effect that probably a mistake has been made between Beta Ceti (Diphda) and Omieron .Ceti (Mira) has the endorsement of ideal astronomers.'. The latter star, which, of course, is situated in the same constellation, is a well-known "variable" with a period of 329 days. It reached its maximum on March i, so that there is little doubt that this was the star of Abbott's observations. If the cabled increase of Beta Ceti had beeiij accurate, instead of being, as it is now, a (2nd) mag. star, it would be a (—1.5) mag, star, and rivalling* in brilliance Sirius (—1.58) mag., the brightest star in the heavens (apart from the planets) and ■■which.is such'an.-unmistakable object at the present time.. One is.not ready, to doubt any message froni such an-eminent astronomer as Elainmarion, of Paris, who, it is reported, has examined the records; but when we consider that Beta Ceti has a declination of.lSdeg. 24min. south, and that Omieron CeM has a declination of 3<leg. Wmin. south, we can understand that the latter,.star would be a more conspicuous object for.continued observation from tlie Paris Observatory, which Is, roughly; 49deg. north latitude. AYe should further consider that even at Athens Observatory, 38deg." north latitude, Beta Ceti would not reach an altitude as high as Aldebaran, that large yellow star to the left of and in a line with the three stars forming Orion's Belt (or the bottom of the pot); whilst Omieron Ceti, from the same observatory, would reach an altitude a little Higher than. Betelgeuze (Orion's Head), that- large red star immediately under the three stars forming Orion's Belt. We have little-doubt, then, that a mistake lias been made, because further than such n. conspicuous southern star as Beta Ceti having evaded the notice of-the keenest local observers, it.seems almost impossible to have escaped detection by one of the recognised greatest astronomers in.the Southern Hemisphere, Mr J. T. Ward, of Wanganui.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HNS19230310.2.67

Bibliographic details

Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLII, Issue XLII, 10 March 1923, Page II

Word Count
343

BETA CETI. Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLII, Issue XLII, 10 March 1923, Page II

BETA CETI. Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLII, Issue XLII, 10 March 1923, Page II

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert