Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FARMERS' UNION DISCUSSION.

PALMERSTON N.; Sept. 9. At the meeting of the. Wellington. Provincial Executive of the, Farmers' i Union at Painierston North, yesterday, Mr. W. J. Poison (the. president), in. speaking of the Arbitration Court, said that the decision of. that tribunal, ' which had. granted shearers a crate ot" 26s 4d per hundred, .would, have, a, dis--astrous effect on pastoraiists. Slaughtermen were, asking 45s per hundred^, lor ' killing sheep. He condemned the state, of affaks, which had. permitted the freezing companies arid their employees ; to arrive, at some, mutual agreement, whereby, the extra cost. to. the companies, snould -be passed on to the producer. They were the. victims of a similar.arrangement between the shipowners and the. wharf, labourers,, and; it was, necessary that the producers should make an.emphatic protest against these, arrangements, to which the farmer, was no party, and endeavour, to; have, thft whole onus of fixing rates, etc.. thrown upon the Arbitration, Court, He. tcqhM ; not go so far as Mr. Biirreil, who had i said at Feilding that the Arbitration. ' Coutrt. had outlived its usefulness and should be abolished, but he. certainly thought the Court had gone mad, and that its decisions weret not on ; saae or sound; economic lines.. Something must be done tor bring them. back, ta their senses. If, the rate for freezing hands i was to be arranged for:, say, the next three years,, without > consulting the Court, the companies would be courting disaster. Freezing company repre- i sentatiyes had, attended; ifie last J Dominion conference of the Farmers' - Union, but the farmers'' representative had received very little satisfaction (Horn them. They admitted th£t they were quite prepared to compromise wfth the employers to some extent, and that 1 \ras what t&e> facrmers were up against. ' Mr. McLean, of B^etihi, drew aitent | tion to the fact that the decisiioiis off' the Arbitration Cosftrt were virtuajly the law of the land, and if they did not abide by the .C©OTt*a rulings they \sQuld be virtually striking. Because tfcirigs were im a bad way at the moment, ■'Inis was not th© time to assert t&a£ the C<wrt had outlived its Tisefulne^av They sliould abide loyally b y any ijpaer that the Court might mafte. Mr. O. P. Lynch, of PwSaparaumu, expressed the opinion t^ai the only solution to the labour pßoolem was to abolish preference to "w&ionists. Mr. A. Buchanan^ of Pabinerston Nortb. thought thai^ the old order of strikes and lock-ox»i^ was preferable to the local impositions of the Court/and said that; he ha<? consistently advocated the abolition of that body.—Dpmimoa cprrespon^at^

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HNS19210912.2.38.3

Bibliographic details

Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLI, Issue XLI, 12 September 1921, Page 5

Word Count
429

FARMERS' UNION DISCUSSION. Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLI, Issue XLI, 12 September 1921, Page 5

FARMERS' UNION DISCUSSION. Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLI, Issue XLI, 12 September 1921, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert