Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXTRA EDITION

BRITISH RAILWAYS

THE DECONTROL BILL

3DISCJJSSION IN THE COMMONS.

;BY CABLE—PEESS* ASSOCIATIOH^OPYEIfiHT ; LONDON, Aug. 9. /. $In the House of Commons, Mr jßarnes moved an amendment to the "Railway Decontrol Bill, assuring rail*raymen of seven seats on the direc■torate of each" group of companies. He aaid that joint control of /industry would do'more than anything else to .lessen disputes. The present proposal would give workers an inside knowledge and a keener, feeling of responsibility. Mr Thomas, in opposing the amend:ment, said that1 amity between the 'companies and the men would not be -achieved by imposing conditions ©n the -companies which they had previously -rejected. If the companies welcomed .Mr Barnes 1 innovation, the workmen would jump at it. In the agreed upon ; scheme, which was already working, ithere was every opportunity for deal2ing with all- disputes. If the workers were ■mistaken in agreeing to'/, that . scheme they were responsible. /Lord Robert Cecil supported theamendment. ' - , I

Sir Eric Geddes, replying, agreed . with the principle underlying the proposal, but pointed out that no railway - . board would, accept it, believing the -■fcime was not yet ripe for such a step. Lord Mildmay and Major Hills, both . directors, said that all', companies regarded the present working scheme as . satisfactory,; and intended to work it smoothly. ,/.-•' # Mr Barnes, welcoming these declarations, withdrew his amendment. Mr Flannery opposed the third reading. He said he regretted that no pro-- \ vision had been made for the election of workmen'directors, of whom he had . :20 years' satisfactory experience. '

The Bill was read a third time,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HNS19210811.2.50

Bibliographic details

Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLI, Issue XLI, 11 August 1921, Page 7

Word Count
257

EXTRA EDITION Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLI, Issue XLI, 11 August 1921, Page 7

EXTRA EDITION Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLI, Issue XLI, 11 August 1921, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert