THE INDER CASE.

Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue LXVIII, 28 June 1912, Page 8

THE INDER CASE.

PLAIXTIFF NONSUITE D

By TELEGBAPH—PBESS ASSOCIATION

AUCKLAND, June 27

The case Inder v. Inder, in which Leah Lillian Inder sought to recover from her husband, William F. Inder, of Gore, £192, alleged to be due under i\\\ agreement by which defendant covenanted to pay plaintiff £3 per week, was continued before Mr Kettle. S.M., this morning. Mr Singer for plaintiff, and Mr Denniston for defendant.

Further evidence was given by a previous female witness, under cross-exam-ination by-,the Magistrate, as to the innocence of plaintiff's relations with men named Stoddart and Wilson, whom she said she knew as bookmakers, and whose business with her and Mrs Inder was iHirely related to a racehorse named Silken Rein, in who.-.n witness was inter-

Witness's ovjdeuce was in part contradicted by Wilson, who was re-sworn. Mr Denni.sbon explained that Stodilart. who v.as in Christen urch. bad torwarded a letter saying that he would fire evidence there, but was unwilling In come un to Auckland, brides which Hie prosecution were unwilling to bear the exnense of bringing him up. Mf Singer applied for a nonsuit, and Mr Dennister asked for costs. ...

Mr Kettle said Mr Ringer iviu wise. His "Worship had wondered all along why oroceeJings had not been tal;:;n under the Destitute Persons Act.

•A uonsiiit whs accordingly entered, v-ith costs against nlaintiff. the questiou fif c-.-»sts to he ndjnsteil in Chambers sm the event of a dispute.