Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OBJECTION TO COMMISSIONER’S REMARK.

PLUMBERS’ DISPUTE INCIDENT. (By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, Last Night. Since neither party was prepared to embarrass its case for Arbitration, the wages, hours of work and overtime clauses in the plumbers’ dispute, which was argued before the Conciliation Commissioner, Mr M. J. Reardon, in Auckland, were not discussed and were referred to the Court. Only partial agreement could be reached on the machinery clauses. During the heaxing the agent for the employers (Mr W. E. Anderson) objected to a remark by the Commissioner about the employers’ wages offer. Later, he suggested that Mr Reardon was acting as an advocate for the workers. The Commissioner replied that he was only making suggestions. If they were not acceptable, they were not acceptable, and there they ended.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19360714.2.51

Bibliographic details

Horowhenua Chronicle, 14 July 1936, Page 7

Word Count
128

OBJECTION TO COMMISSIONER’S REMARK. Horowhenua Chronicle, 14 July 1936, Page 7

OBJECTION TO COMMISSIONER’S REMARK. Horowhenua Chronicle, 14 July 1936, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert