A Higher Exchange Defended'
COATES AT FARMERS ’ CONFERENCE * WELLINGTON, Last Night. Quoting a cablegram which he received from the Prime Minister, in which Mr Forbes Mated that the consensus of opinion in London was that, under the circumstances, New Zealand had followed the only course in raising the exchange, the Acting-Prime Minister (the Rt. Hon. J. G. Coates), in addressing the Dominion Conference of the New Zealand Farmers’ Union today, expressed the view that the primary producers were now feeling the benefits which the Government had claimed would follow the manipulation of the exchange. After referring to steps taken by the Government to reduce costs, Mr. Coates said the Coalition Government had been faced with the necessity of deciding whether an inflationary policy should be introduced. In view of the World Economic Conference, he did not intend to say very much about monetary questions,, except that it was desirable that such matters should be approached with .a perfectly open mind. No proposal had been put forward yet which was not worthy of the most Careful consideration. ‘‘But,’ * said Mr Coates, Qwo must make certain that there arc going to bo no mistakes. A mistake might well leave us in an infinitely worse position than we are in at present. "Wo cannot afford to take anything on its face value, but must bring the most minute examination to j){jar on every proposal that is put forward.” . Mr Coates said there was a difference of opinion so far as the raising of the exchange rate was concerned, and it was fitting that he should try to show what was at the back of the Government’s mind. In the first place, it had to decide what was the basic industry of the Dominion. The Government was surely on sound ground when it said that the primary production of New Zealand was "the basis of the country’s prosperity. New Zealand was essentially a primary -producing country, and would continue to be. That being so, it was necessary to have a look at the farmer’s position. How was the farmer getting along? They would say, “Not to well,” and the Government realised that fact. The Budget position showed the way., the farmer was placed. The Government, he thought, justified in allowing the public accounts to stand a certain amount of strain if it meant that the farmer was going to be assisted, for when the position of the farmer improved the position of the public accounts would improve accordingly. Costs and Prices The Government had considered every phase of the problems of the farmer, especially the marked disparity between costs and prices. In January last there had been a gap of nearly 50 per cent, between costs and prices, as compared with the 1914 level, and the Government naturally had to face up to the position. He thought, and his colleagues thought, that the Government could no longer follow a deflationary policy, and accordingly it had been decided to raise the exchange.
They had heard a lot of criticism from the United Kingdom and elsewhere about breaking faith and so on, but in his view a lot of the criticism was jot worth listening to. Only last Saturday he had received a cablegram from the Prime Minister, in which Mr Forbes said the consensus of opinion among people in London experts and authorities —was that under the circumstances New Zealand could do nothing else but follow the course she had done. Mr Coates said he believed that to be a correct interpretation of the position. Prices Have Risen
The raising, of the exchange rate, said Mr Coates, had certainly had the effect—artificially, of course —of raising the prices of primary commodities produced in New Zealand. Prices had been increased by 15 per cent, as from January last, and there had been benefits in other directions. Much of the criticism which had been levelled at the Government had been deliberate, although he believed it was perfectly honest. There had certainly been a fall in prices in the overseas markets since January, but in recent months there had been a recovery in meat, wool and dairy produce. The question was: Is it not better that I should receive a monthly cheque of £4O than a monthly cheque of £3O? That was the practical effect of increasing the price. Mr Coates claimed that the Government’s .opinion as to the benefits that would follow the rais’ing of the exchange was panning out. There were more New Zealand pound notes in the country than there was in January last, and the raising of prices had helped in a great measure to bridge' the gap between costs and prices.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19330713.2.52
Bibliographic details
Horowhenua Chronicle, 13 July 1933, Page 8
Word Count
778A Higher Exchange Defended' Horowhenua Chronicle, 13 July 1933, Page 8
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Horowhenua Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.