Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A PRINCE NO LONGER.

SAMOAN WHO WAS BANISHED.

OBJECTS TO SUBDIVISION OF ■ LAND. (Received This Day, 11.30 a.m.) (Special to Press Association). (Bv Radio). APIA, Oct. 3rd. Moananu Faafoi told the Commission that Malietoa, witness’s father, was a king, but witness was disentitled and banished for discussing the pedigrees of chiefs and referring contemptuously to 1 speech made by another chief. "Witness said that such chiefs had complained against him, but he was of higher rank than they. He was against the medical tax and against the Administration’s proposed subdivision of land, which might cause trouble to his family and result in witness having to work for someone else. The authority given to the Faipules by the Administrator made (them overbearing, though they were only Government servants, representing nobody.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19271004.2.25

Bibliographic details

Horowhenua Chronicle, 4 October 1927, Page 5

Word Count
129

A PRINCE NO LONGER. Horowhenua Chronicle, 4 October 1927, Page 5

A PRINCE NO LONGER. Horowhenua Chronicle, 4 October 1927, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert