T H E CASE OF WALTER TRICKER.
Refusal - ; -or \'K «a o tvQßAHaa .RAStft* Indejgndemt, May (l 9;) disf.i satisfaction : aii.ci t^al ; learn 1 theeksffd£ 3Mckexr;wMch ia>e6htalned in:the> following perliitehdent;—'; * ,-vf yUi.T " * ,',; . . *■;.. -;•• .< V'.'Colonial-Secretary’s Office,, Wellington, ,sfch May, 1868.„ Sir;—The carefully! ’ memorial! presented.by ypuClffonpr 1 the Gibyernbr; from the settlers at Rahgi-i tikei, pWying-iihat further-inquiry rimy*'Be! instituted intct the case; of the convict Trioker, and of your Honor’s letter of 23rd-Marchlast relatiVeVthereto.'andi have! to state that J;he Governor cannot be .ad* ■vised to mferfere with the commuted sentence of -'pifnishmentr under which tha 4 - convict is, now,, confined in gaol—l have, -&c. ' v * ’ / • : T. M. Haultain, ' For the Colonial Secretary, •; :His Honor the : Superintendent, ' ■•!
: A morejust and reasonable request could not have been .'made than that of the Rangidkei'memorialists, They: pointed out 'that' Tricker was convicted almost exclusively •on the evidence of a,half-caste, boy named Hamilton, who ; swore that he saw the murder committed m open day, at ten o’clock ini the 1 morning, ‘within a few yards of ai public main road.' This boy a few! weeks before, when examined-before! the Coroner, had positively denied all! knowledge of the murder, and only! caipe forward as Tricker’s accuser! wben ; a large reward \vSs‘ offered for* th> discovery of the perpetrator* : They I further urged.tbat.the;boy?s s'tory was J of the most improbable character;! that in their: -opinion,. as-persons tho-. roughly -acquainted! with the jßangiti-Tricker-had proved an aZi6i, ~and that' ijf ; was ; fimpbSsible he c ?uJ<i hstve cqmmitted-the murder atj the time and in the manner alleged by thepeijured half-caste. Finally; they! Pointed out' that' : though' -'Tricker was ! convicted and; sentenced: to: .death, yet he :^ a *i .not. because the advisers of Sir George Grey, no fewer than four of whoni were members” of tlie legal- thought the case sor.doubtful that they* refused to advise his Excellency to have-the capital penalty inflicted. It was,-said* they, a course entirely without precedent that a ’British subject should be deprived of his liberty for life under such circumstances.;. that-is to . say, amdera sen:;: tence ..commuted for. no ‘other- reason! than because the Executive disbelieved the evidence on which .the prisoner was convicted. “ Tricker,”; they contended with irresistible logic, should either have been hangeclor.pardoned.” W.e t ,certainly entertained a .hope that the - prayer .of the memorialists j would bave been granted by -the 1 issue; of a cpminission of inquiry. /Fob years the; Kangitikei people have called for an inquiry, and ; they did hope that this appeal to his Excellency Sir Geo. Bo wen-would not; have - bden -made in This anticipation ? has ;hpt] bepn realised, in curt,.) an<i?scarceiy! courteous terms, they are informed ** that the Governor cannot be advised to .interfere with the commuted.sentence trader which the convict is now confined; in gaol;” The memorialists did not ask. the Governor to interfere with .the commuted -sentence. They expressed a convicfcion“ that if a commission with; power .to take evidence npon oath were appointed to investigate the subject uppn the,, spot where the occurred,itwould bemade apparent that » case existed for the exercise, of the prerogative of mercy, by granting,a; free .Tricker.” The man’s liberatipn was. not asked for,; but an inquiry was demandecb with the-object; ; of his* innocence. The meihoriansts idid nbti wish the sentehcedo so ;inti^fe,red; \^h-bedause they i ;though to theimanuinnocenfei but they- urged - thatiT - facts pointedito; that &~dct of jgreat done; ?that this-wqnid;- be, investigation,! 4^t^t^'4t^^; ; longer i beiaUowcd do -snffer - We:-xh.ia)s the Government have. done, a‘grievous m .done 4n^th§ ; caae.ofi Triekerjsodong >; ,-y ;
as'the fi.ce;; ' arid" thosewho think lie fias been : illegally iand ! s wrongfullyi ‘convicted •\ .must; awrijt;;the<;jfcime ;wh.en the.. Trear smry benches\wijl ';^)ej.ocipupie^ t by (new men, [ will » rihjappealjfor jiisiticej such l 7as f ti>at "iriadq bjy*tfoe £ me morialists whose prayer Has l been;fefused^ ,v - . ; v ■l> ‘i- > **•" V..",
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBWT18680518.2.24
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Weekly Times, Volume 2, Issue 72, 18 May 1868, Page 122
Word Count
625THE CASE OF WALTER TRICKER. Hawke's Bay Weekly Times, Volume 2, Issue 72, 18 May 1868, Page 122
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.