Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WRESTLING

CLAIM AGAINST ALLEY. MAGISTRATE’S DECISION. By Telegraph—Press Association Wellington, Dec. 7. In the claim of the Canterbury i Wrestling Association against Tom Alley for £54 4/2 damages for alleged breach of contract in failing to meet McDougall at Christchurch on November 9, the Magistrate, Mr T. B. McNeil, decided in Alley’s favour. Alley admitted that there was a contract, but contended that his physical condition was such that it was impossible for him to fulfil the contract. He produced a medical certificate showing that he was suffering from bronchitis and influenza at the time. The Magistrate commented that he was bound to say that he thought Alley should have notified the Christchurch people earlier than the date of tho contest that he would not be appearing.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19311207.2.67

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXI, Issue 303, 7 December 1931, Page 7

Word Count
127

WRESTLING Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXI, Issue 303, 7 December 1931, Page 7

WRESTLING Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXI, Issue 303, 7 December 1931, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert