Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SAMOAN INQUIRY

MAU ACTIVITIES CONFIRMED BY NATIVE OFFICIALS. CONDITION'S IN SAVAII. ——.-4 (Received 20. 8.5 a.m.) Apia, October 20, Before the Commission. Fagamalo and Savaai native officials confirmed in all respects the evidence of other native officials at the Apia sittings concerning Mau activities and interference of the Mau with the functions of the Administration. Testimony was given that in Savaii conditions were existing similar to those at Upolu—neglect of plantations, no searching for beetles, taxes, and licenses due and unpaid, and Court summonses treated with contempt. Two European inspectors testified to there being no trouble before tne Mau started, but since the Apia public meeting it had ioiined the natives in political agitation. The inspectors were unable to discharge their duties because the natives would not obey, alleging they had instructions from the Apia Mau Committee. One chief, when pressed to give a reason, said Mr Nelson had gone to Europe to see a greater Power than New Zealand about a transfer of the mandate, and Samoans were awaiting Mr Nel sons return. In Savaii large areas oi bananas planted for export bv New Zealand’s new insulated vessel were absolutely neglected, and no fruit cargo was available from Savaii. The Resident Commissioner deposed that 400 cases pending before the Courts had been deferred because, in the present mental attitude of Samoans, they would probably lead to further offences. All Administration activities were functioning splendidly to November last, but now were at a standstill, and they could not effect arrests.

To Sir C. P. Skerrett he emphatically denied that the Samoans were timid and afraid to express their complaints or air their grievances to the Administrator or any other official. Judicial procedure for the banishments was possible, but inadvisable. Removals of culprits from their home village often averted a traced v therefore banishments were entirely in the interest of the offender concerned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19271020.2.48

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XVII, 20 October 1927, Page 8

Word Count
312

SAMOAN INQUIRY Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XVII, 20 October 1927, Page 8

SAMOAN INQUIRY Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XVII, 20 October 1927, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert