Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HASTINGS SANITARY INSPECTION.

[TO THE EDITOE-1 Sir, —I noticed in your last even j ing’s issue the remarks of the; Borough Inspector regarding ) “Health’s” letter. I have no desire ■ to belittle Mr. Fawcett’s energies in' the cause* of public health, but at: the same time one cannot get away | from facts. 1 repeat what I stated) in my former letter that some of! the premises in Hastings are abso- ' lately a disgrace to the town, in fact, if I had my way I would see ' that some of them were burned to the ground. Mr. Fawcett says that ’ there is no cause for alarm, also 1 according to your report that the ■ conditions could not cause an epi- : demic, and that! he has five, men 1 inspecting the various places picking out the worst cases, which, he says, ’ are very few. The very fact that he ' has five inspectors does not suggest ’ to any common-sense person that ! the number of cases are few. On the contrary, to my mind, it seems 3 that there are a great many eases > to investigate. If I am wrong, well, why the necessity for these five in- ' spectors to inspect a very few cases. ’ 1 do not begrudge Mr. Fawcett five inspectors. If the work he has in ’ hand is beyond one man's capabilities then'by all means he should 1 have all the extra assistance re--3 quired on such important work, and, as I stated before, these inspectors 1 should have fuller power to act and ’ should be authorised to inspect the interior of dwellings as well as the 3 exterior and so get at the real living e conditions. I am confident that m = the near future this will have to be a done. It- is quite a fair proposition e and one that any right-thinking e person would not reject. For ine stance a familv may go into a new house with first class surroundings, ~ drainage etc., and everything up-to* r date and in twelve months’ time, d or less, the same premises may be e in a delanidated and filthy condition. Or, again, the outside n buildings mav be in good condition - l ' and everything in the garden lovely. n but what does that nrofit if the ini- terior of the dwelling is filthy. *•" This has been proved to be the. case 0 in other towns, and Hastings is no I OT, "«;; HEALTn; . i- Hastings, December 4tb. 1913.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19181204.2.6.3

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume VIII, Issue 311, 4 December 1918, Page 3

Word Count
407

HASTINGS SANITARY INSPECTION. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume VIII, Issue 311, 4 December 1918, Page 3

HASTINGS SANITARY INSPECTION. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume VIII, Issue 311, 4 December 1918, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert