PANAMA CANAL.
BRITAIN’S PREVIOUS CONCESSIONS. ENTITLE HER TO EQUAL TREATMENT. ' (Received 23. 9.25 a.m) Washington, July 22. ! A point raised against preferential tolls is that it is umea.sonnnle suppose Great Britain would haxe Inride important concessions to tie United States in reeard to the own'ership and exen fortifications of the canal zone without receiving a q«i‘l pro quo. The latter natiirMlv mu-i be equal lre-itme::t. _ , Summarising the i.pimon ot tnj Press from east to west, arbitration is the comiuo!i<‘st suggi ~ti-<n. Fh>British pi most is. received sympa-th;-licallx . The XT hoh-business is partially due to the manceuv’ing of the ; .-iilisidy clique. The same : arguments will be brought against : differential tolls as hitherto By the defeated cliques in thr-ir efforts to (obtain subventions.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19120723.2.60
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 187, 23 July 1912, Page 5
Word Count
121PANAMA CANAL. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 187, 23 July 1912, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in