SUPREME COURT.
NAPIER CIVIL SESSION. SATURDAY, MARCH 9th, 1912.' (Before Sir R. Stout, Chief Justice.) APPEAL. In the appeal, Ries v. Nielson, his Honour allowed the appeal on the ground that tlie man Nielson did the work ip the hope that a partnership would b? entered into, and there was no implied agreement to pay wages. BANKRUPTCY. Several matters in bankruptcy were mentioned and formally adjourned until Monday week. DIVORCE. In the case, Bullick v. BulHck, wife’s p tition on the grounds of desertion and d unkenness, the statement showed that the parties were married on June Ist, 1378, at Geraldine. She had lived with i . spondent in Canterbury, and there were nine children as the issue of the marriage. Since 18S1 respondent had b v>n an habitual drunkard, and had l.'i't the petitioner without means of support. In January, 1901, he wilfully d. sorted her, and since that date desertion had been continuous. The petitioner is a resident of Hastings, and the respondent lives at Te Ante. His Honour said that it would be adv Liable to have some corroborative evid -ace, and adjourned the further hearii g of the petition until his return from G i.sborne. Air. Dolan appeared for the petitioner. The Court then adjourned until Monday.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19120309.2.68
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 72, 9 March 1912, Page 6
Word Count
210SUPREME COURT. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 72, 9 March 1912, Page 6
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in