Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HARBOUR MATTERS.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir,—The articles appearing in the “Hawke’s Ray Herald’’ are too silly to be worthy of criticism. What the board should do without further,delay- was advised by a meeting of workers at Westshore a year ago.— Buy a Dredge. It is amusing to notice how sure some members of the Harbour Board are that they would have bought the wrong type unless they -had experimented with the Whakarire. If Mr. George ’Nelson’s advice had been asked he is far too well informed and too thorough to make any such silly mistake—but the board persists in ig- ■ nt-ring his value, 'because, presumably- some members are afraid of what a section of the public may say if he is engaged as engineer. He is not a good judge of men, but as an engineer he will prove himself to be. brilliant. The position which .must be dinned into the “Herald” and the “Telegraph” until they fear to pretend to be blind is this: Whichever liarbmir is proceeded with, the Inner Harbour has to be maintained because the Breakwater, even if completed, could not accommodate all the shipping now going to the Inner Harbour, and the larger vessels in addition. The present method of maintenance is typical of the. ignorant pigheadedness of the old Breakwater party led by Mr. J. Vigor Brown. The river silt is allowed to be discharged right into the fair way, and thousands of pounds have been spent, in the employment of the J.D.O. digging it out. A proper plant is required to build an embankment to direct its deposits to effectively remove existing deposits to open the channel which the old board scandalously allowed to (remain closed, to dredge out the Breakwater harbour,, which is continually’silting up, and- to complete the improvement of removing the patch in a permanent manner. Small ports like Poverty- Bay call afford to buy a proper plant, yet the illustrious editor of the “Hawke’s Bay Herald” deliberately sets himself to pre vent the Napier Board from doing what is so conspicuously the correct thing, and in bis littleness he refers to the confusion of thought of members of the board. Why does he not take by the hand and help to the front the young party who gave such excellent advice a year ago.--I am, etc., THE N.Z. LABOUR PARTY. Westshore, Jan. 18, 1912.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19120118.2.28

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 30, 18 January 1912, Page 4

Word Count
395

HARBOUR MATTERS. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 30, 18 January 1912, Page 4

HARBOUR MATTERS. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 30, 18 January 1912, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert