Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARLIAMENT BILL

THE QUESTION OF TACKING. (press association. —COPYRIGHT]. (Received 1, 9.20 a.m.) London, June 30. The House of Lords discussed the question of tacking m connection with the Parliament Bill. Lord Haldane, expounding the Government’s view stated that though Mr. Asquith defined tacking as including in. the Financial Bill the strenuous provisions directed for social and political purposes, he never suggested that a money bill must be devoted to such purposes. The Cromer clause was finally adopted by 192 to 48. This clause empowers a joint committee to sit in judgment on finance bills, to set aside for supremacy the Veto Bill, whose governing purposes brings it within the category of general legislation.

Lords Nelson, St. Aldwyn, and Lytton voted with the Government.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19110701.2.19

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume I, Issue 167, 1 July 1911, Page 1

Word Count
124

PARLIAMENT BILL Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume I, Issue 167, 1 July 1911, Page 1

PARLIAMENT BILL Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume I, Issue 167, 1 July 1911, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert