Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A JUDGMENT REVERSED.

[BY TILEQBAPH.]| Auokiand, Thursday. In the Supreme Court to-day Mr Justice Conolly gave judgment in Ehrman v. Bunting, an appeal from the judgment of Mr Brubant, S.M., in a case arising out of the Daley bankruptcy. The faots were that Ehrm&n had aocepted a bill drawn by Doble and Son, of London, and that Ehrman asked Bunting to advance money to meet this bill. This Bunting did, receiving £18 odd in cash, and a bill of Daley's for the balance. The question in dispute was whether Daley's bill was accepted as payment by Bunting or merely as a security. Mr Brabant took the latter view, and gave judgment for Bunting for J369 odd, but Judge Conolly reversed this judgment, ordering judgment to be entered for Ehrman, and refusing leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBH19000720.2.10

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Herald, Volume XXXV, Issue 11593, 20 July 1900, Page 2

Word Count
139

A JUDGMENT REVERSED. Hawke's Bay Herald, Volume XXXV, Issue 11593, 20 July 1900, Page 2

A JUDGMENT REVERSED. Hawke's Bay Herald, Volume XXXV, Issue 11593, 20 July 1900, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert