Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURTS AND OFFENCES.

WOMEN INSULTED. (By Tolr-graph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, June 12. Maurice Tangney, aged 32 years, was charged with assaulting two women in the street by spitting in their faces. One young woman said Tangney made a rude remark and then spat in her face. The other young woman said Tangney hissed at her. but did not spit. Tangney said he did not spit on the women; but merely‘hissed tio' attract their attention. ■Air Hunt, S.AI., sentenced accused to two months’ imprisonment on each charge the sentences to he cumulativelie said to Tangney ; “Eight or ninja yeans ago I gave you six months’ imprisonment in Wellington for a similar offence. Oil that occasion you were stopping anil accosting women in the street. ’ ’ AN UNUSUAL PROSECUTION'. CHRISTCHURCH, June 13. Ain unusual prosecution was conducted by the Labour Department in the Magistrate's Court here to-day. William Brian was charged that ora. December 13, 1027, at Southbridge, be pretended to be am inspector for the Labour Department. Evidence was that a man called: at a Southbridge hotel on that date representing himself as am inspector. Ho interviewed the staff regarding 'grievances as to wages, overtime and hours of work. They had grievances, but he told them that they were well .treated and were obtaining all the wages to Which they were entitled, and. that they should hold on to their jobs. It was suggested by the prosecution that the man did this to help the licensee, who, it was said, was committing ebvious breaches of the award. Other evidence was to the effect that the bogus inspector was Brian. The case was dismissed because the proceedings had 1 been instituted too late, five months after the offence, while the legal limit was three months. Counsel for Brian stated, however, that he had witnesses to prove Brian was not the bogus inspector.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19280614.2.41

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVII, 14 June 1928, Page 5

Word Count
308

COURTS AND OFFENCES. Hawera Star, Volume XLVII, 14 June 1928, Page 5

COURTS AND OFFENCES. Hawera Star, Volume XLVII, 14 June 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert