A NURSE’S CLAIM.
£ T 1 I F AJ AG ISTRATE’S DFICJ SION. uiv risx.CGitAPn— punas association. > A l OK LA ND, Jung 22. 'I lie Aiagkstra.te, Air. AlcKean, gave b.i.s judgment. tii-i.s morning in an notion hioag.liit by Nurse Biiaiiciie .Donah!, of A iici.cla-nd. for nurwing tees totalling £)) iL. agaitusl 'I ho minis Clarke, a, mi-ll-Irm.l, (ill Alamaku. mi ros|>etit of the Lilli of Alts. Clarke'.*' baby, which died a day after birth. Clarke counter- < iaimed for £63 12. sßd waniages, alleging negligence. A lengthy written judgment eoiiciltidei i : “I. sum ol the opinion that a broach el duty haw been established, but the evidence dues not establii.sh that Alls. ( -ilirke s condition -is the direct or prox-i.ma-te result, of that bleach. The husband, therei ore. is entitled only to nominal damages. £L with, court coish-i and witnesses’ expense.--. the .slight annoyances of which Alls. Clarke eomplmins art: iii.-ulLrien-t to disentitle the plaintiff to lie paid. except flic deduction for ilie first day, and judgment t liercil'ore is given for Nurse Donald for £9 on the el.'aim.''
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19270623.2.48
Bibliographic details
Hawera Star, Volume XLVI, 23 June 1927, Page 7
Word Count
177A NURSE’S CLAIM. Hawera Star, Volume XLVI, 23 June 1927, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hawera Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.