APPEAL COURT.
FLOURMILLERS’ CASE. (BY TELEGRAPH. PRESS ASSOCIATION.) WELLINGTON, .Inly 24. In the Appeal Court, continuing his argument for the respondents in the flourmilling case, Mr Skerrett said that the obiect of the combination was not to limit the quantity of flour sold in New Zealand, nor did it seek to drive out Competition or ruin competitors. The combination did not manufacture flour, nor was it responsible for the deficiency in the quality of flour. The fact that there was a partial monopoly did not make the combine unlawful, unless it was of a nature contrary to public interest. The hearing is proceeding.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19250724.2.71
Bibliographic details
Hawera Star, Volume XLV, 24 July 1925, Page 9
Word Count
103APPEAL COURT. Hawera Star, Volume XLV, 24 July 1925, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hawera Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in