Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ENGINEERS’ AWARD.

POSITION OF IMMIGRANTS. (BY TELEGRAPH - 'PRESS ASSOCIATION. AUCKLAND, Dec. 15. At the sitting of tlie Arbitration Court this morning Mr F. Barter isec. rotary of the Amalgamated Society of Engineers’ Union at Auckland) said chat as the result of the publication oi a statement in the newspapers, in which Mr. Justice Frazer was credited with saying that many of .the immigrant engineers arriving from England were specialists and not all-round men, and therefore should be granted underrate workers’ permits, he (Mr. Barter) had received several applications lor such permits. Mr. Justice Frazer said that so far as he knew the papers had reported him correctly, but in Wellington there had apparently been some misunderstanding. What he said at the West Coast was that many of the engineers coming out from England were specialists, and did not have the all-round general knowledge required of engineers m the Dominion. Unfortunately .New Zealand had not reached a high standard when specialists were required for every branch of the trade, but so far as he could see there should be no objection to a man, who was a specialist in one particular line, being granted an under-rate workers* permit until such time as he extended his knowledge. *‘Nobody for a moment suggests that it is because trade might be slack,” ldded His Honour, “or that they should be allowed to work at cheap rates, but simply that these specialists should be paid what they are worth until they here.” When making an application to have the firm of Armstrong, Whitworth and Co. made a party to an award this morning, Mr. Sutherland (secretary of the Ironworkers’ Union) said: “I can’t see for the life of me why Armstrong and Whitworth want exemption. If they are granted exemption every emboyor in New Zealand could appi.s There are any amount of men in New Zealand able to carry out the work and comply with the existing awards too.” Messrs Armstrong, Whitworth and Co. are contractors for the Arapuni dam, and have entered into an agreement with the New Zealand Workers* Union, an unregistered body, in wJii'h t has been agreed that overtime rates are not to be paid until a week’s work of 48 hours has been put in, whereas the various Arbitration Court awards provide for the payment of overtime rates after 44 hours have been worked in anv one week.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19241216.2.42

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 16 December 1924, Page 5

Word Count
398

ENGINEERS’ AWARD. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 16 December 1924, Page 5

ENGINEERS’ AWARD. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 16 December 1924, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert