Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRICKET.

UMPIRE’S DECISIONS. OPEN TO CRITICISM. JY CABLE—PRESS ASSOCIATION—COPYRIGHT. Received Dec. 9, 11.10 a.m. SYDNEY, Dec .9. - The Telegraph’s cricket special correspondent criticises som© of .the umpire’s decisions in the English match on Saturday. He says it was an obvious mistake when Sutcliffe was given out leg lie fore. Neither . bowler nor the wicket-keeper appeaTett: Hendry asked the umpire to reverse the decision and he refused. The corresnondent adds : “According to Hendry there was another bad decision when Chapman was given mot out for\ a catch at the wicket. Ultimately Chapman was given out stumped when obviously his bat was grounded before the wicket was broken.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19241209.2.50

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 9 December 1924, Page 5

Word Count
106

CRICKET. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 9 December 1924, Page 5

CRICKET. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 9 December 1924, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert