Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE IMPOUNDING QUESTION.

[To the Editor.] Sir,—As the Borough Council meet next week I hope the owners of stock in Hastings will again petition them to alter the borough byelaws which compel persons who are unfortunate enough to find their cattle in the pound to appear to answer a a charge in the Magistrate's Court. It is ridiculous to say that the Council cannot amend a bye-law they have themselves made. Is it because the fines go into the coffers of the Council that members are so anxious to keep up the obnoxious anomaly ? In time the police will have to keep a list of those who have IB not appeared to answer these charges —it may not be so long as the list of those who have already been before the Magistrates. I wish people would wake up to the injustice of the whole affair and demand that the bye-law be struck out. I am, &c., ScFFEREB.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAST18960731.2.8.2

Bibliographic details

Hastings Standard, Issue 82, 31 July 1896, Page 2

Word Count
158

THE IMPOUNDING QUESTION. Hastings Standard, Issue 82, 31 July 1896, Page 2

THE IMPOUNDING QUESTION. Hastings Standard, Issue 82, 31 July 1896, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert