Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WASHINGTON’S F.O.

■ ’ NEW YORK. Some time ago the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey asked the State Department for permission to sell aviation gasoline to an air-line running from Brazil to Italy. Now if it had asked ten people on the street instead, like an inquiring reporter, nine' of them would have said “No.” If it had asked a corner’s jury, or a Rotary lunch meeting or the New York Yankees or the window cleaners’ union or the boys in the back room, they would all have said No. The State Department said “Yes.”

’This Department has almost always said “Yes” in similar circumstances. Whether the question has been selling oil to Japan, or kicking the Free French out of St. Pierre, or letting the Japanese have Americandesigned aeroplane engines, or sending supplies to French North Africa, the word has been “Yes 1 Yes! Yes!

But on almost all of these questions the people of the United States, if asked, would have said “No! No! No!” They would have hit the ceiling every time. The State Department never hits the ceiling, though it has sat through a decade of such horror that the sound of heads against ceilings should have been a continuous thumping noise, like riveting.

And so (painfully conscious of the dangers of criticisng public officials in war time) I make the temperate suggestion that the State Department should be staffed by men who have, by and large, the same reactions to the same events as do the majority of Americans. What makes us furious should make it furious. That is not asking for disunity, but unity.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19430610.2.57.5

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 10 June 1943, Page 7

Word Count
269

WASHINGTON’S F.O. Grey River Argus, 10 June 1943, Page 7

WASHINGTON’S F.O. Grey River Argus, 10 June 1943, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert