Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FINDLAY CASE

MRS. WILLIAMS CALLED Findlay’s Remark (Aus. and N.Z. Cable Assn.) (Received February 11, at 8.30 p.m.) SYDNEY, February 11. Giving evidence in the Findlay case to-day. Madge Campbell, wife of on? cf the defendants, told of plans that allegedly were made to enable her husband, William Campbell, to abscond to New Zealand. On one occasion, Detective Findlay told her to go upstairs at the Hotel Australia, as Detective James might recognise her. He also advised her not to go to the boat, a? the water police might recognise her. As a matter of fact, Findlay assisted her to accompany her husband t(. New Zealand, where the pair later were arrested. She was discharged on bond. On one occasion she paid thirty pounds to Findlay.

Asked whether she had seen men with the Chargol mixture, Mrs Campbell said: “1 could not help seeing them. They were always messing about with it. Tanser never discussed anything else but Chargol. I got sick of the song.” She added: “My husband had many aliases, and when he lived under another name. I adopted it.” While Mrs Campbell was being crossexamined by her husband; ex-Detective Findlay made a remark, whereupon Campbell appealed to the Bench to protect him, declaring that Findlay had called him a very offensive name. Findlay interjeeetd: “I never used that word,” adding: “Campbell is a liar if he says I did! ” The Crown prosecutor’s assistant declared that he had heard it. The Magistrate, Mr Shepherd, ordered that Findlay be charged with contempt of Court and be dealt with later. LATER. When Findlay later was charged with contempt of court, he pleaded guilty, and was fined £2O. Mrs Campbell had not concluded her evidence when the Court adjourned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19360212.2.35

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 12 February 1936, Page 5

Word Count
288

FINDLAY CASE Grey River Argus, 12 February 1936, Page 5

FINDLAY CASE Grey River Argus, 12 February 1936, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert