FORCED EXPORTS
AUSTRALIAN LAW. WILL IT STAND? (Aus. and N.Z. Cable Assn.) SYDNEY, June 11. The High Court of Australia has given a decision of vital importance affecting the marketing legislation of Australia, by holding, in effect, that the Commonwealth is not bound by Section 92 of the Commonwealth Con stitution providing for free trade between the States. It was indicated the judgment was treated as urgent, so that it could be tested before the Privy Council.
The legislation whereto the judgment referred was the Common wealth Dried Emits Act 1928/35, and the points at issue was whether the Com monwealth had power to require a merchant to market a portion of his dried fruits output overseas, when he desired to place it on the Aus 1 tralian market. The Court unanimously disallowed a claim by Frederick James, fruit mer chant, of Adelaide, that the Dried Fruits Act was beyond the powers of the Federal Parliament.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19350613.2.11
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, 13 June 1935, Page 2
Word Count
156FORCED EXPORTS Grey River Argus, 13 June 1935, Page 2
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.