POLISH CRIMES.
WHOLE FAMILY MURDERED. ASSASSINS SHOT BY NEIGHBOUR WARSAW, February 6. Four well dressed men arrived at night at the residence of a wealthy landowner, Jiving at Klodow, and asked to be occommodatcd owing to running out of petrol. The landowner put up two and a neighbour at midnight surprised the men burgling hs safe and killed them. Shortly afterwards accomplices arrived and attacked the landowner who. assisted by servants, defeated and killed the intruders. It was later discovered that the strangers had murdered a neighbour and his wife and three daughters. an extra hour a day? A.—That was for their own good. Q. —Do yon knew that in Hie first thr"e months of this year, when the miners were forced to work this exl;-:i hour, that there were 324 miners killed and 1291 seriously injured? A. —I don’t remember the figures. Q. —While for the first three months of the previous year there were 306 killed and 1214 seriously injured? A.—l don ’I know. Q. —And were lhei’e no) 100,000 more miners an cm ployed than in the year before? ' A.— I don’t know. Q. — Ain! did you have th<‘ bare-faced audacity Io go to f'ardifl' to tell the country that Hip coal trade was recovering and that yon were Hie colliers’ friend.’ A.—Give peace in our time, oh Lord At this stage an inlerruptor alleged Io lie Lord Rot herniere shouted. “What about ‘Votes for Flappers? 4 ” and was ejected. Q. —Did you appeal for greater confidence between employer and employ A.—Yes. Q. —And to prove your earnestness are you prepared Io drop your Blacklegs’ ('barter.’ A.—(•'(’ ria inly no!. (£. — In your Cardiff speech did you not refer to Lor i Rotbermere? A.—Yes. ) wanted Io know whether he was backing me or Lloyd George. Q. — Did you reply to Lord RotherI mere’s cha Henge ? A.—What challenge? I Q. —Don’t you read the “Daily I Mail?” Do you not know that Lord | Rotherm- re has challenged the Tory 'Party to publish its balance sheets for the last five years, so that the nation I can see where the money conies from? Are you prepared to do this? I A.—Emphatically no. Why should ; I give the whole show away? 1 And while you are not prepared te do this you are prepared to defend I legislation preventing the trade unions I collecting a shilling a year for their funds ? A.—That is entirely different. After Sir Douglas Fogg hud delivered an eloquent speech about the accused’s honesty and his affection for pigs the jury retired, and after a short absence returned with a verdict of “Guilty.” Judge Commonsensc said that he thought every intelligent citizen had, come to realise that as a Prime Mini-, ster the accused had been a complete and hopeless failure. His conduct during the miners’ lockout had proved conclusively that his “Peace in Our Time, O Lord,” talk was sheer humbug. He was all the time first and foremost a company director acting in I the interests of big business and greedy Capitalism. He would be sentenced to forfeit his job as Prime Minister, pay back the salary he had obtained from the nation under false pretences, and be sent to work cleaning out pig sties in Worcestershire at the lowest rate of wages received in that county by an i agricultural labourer. —“Forward” I (Glasgow.)
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19280210.2.66
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, 10 February 1928, Page 8
Word Count
560POLISH CRIMES. Grey River Argus, 10 February 1928, Page 8
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.