EMPIRE UNITY.
IS TRADE THE CEMENT? TORY M.l’.’S VIEW. (Received October 28 at 10 p.m.) LONDON .October 27. Sir Henry ttie Conservative M.P., opened the Empire Industries’ Association’s .campaign at Stratford. He stated that, at a moment when it ,was abundantly clear ■ that Britain’s liie as an exporting nation depended, upon the Empire, the South African premier, Mr Hertzog, had made a claim for an independent iia-| tion;il status for Soutn Africa, vvliieh, if granted, would, he said, mean the dissolution of the Empire. He (lid not believe that Mr Hertzog’s demand really represented South Africa, for persiytpnee in the demand would entail the breakup of the South African I'niop. It was largely the fault of ttie Britisli Government and of the electors tliii.t such sentiments should be expressed. It was upwards of a generation since Cape Colony gave a trade preference to Britain, and yet until two years ago, Britltm nad not responded. Even now her policy was i.'L’gardly. It was unworthy of the spirit of the Empire.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19261029.2.39
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, 29 October 1926, Page 5
Word Count
169EMPIRE UNITY. Grey River Argus, 29 October 1926, Page 5
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.