Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHY DELAY?

A MENACE TO HEALTH. Breeze at Borough Council, j At last night's meeting there was ft-■ breeze at the Borough (’oiincil over lhe I removal of what the members <-eiierally agreed is a mernice the hcallh of the public, but as Io whether the ;u-tion in it moving which should be immediate or mediate there was a difference of I opinion. The ’ ccasion of th" .1 isuu-<i.m was a: letter from the Distri.t Public Trustee in regard to the drainage of the Tivoii sections, in Herbert Street. The letter stated that the Railway Department ■ [had been written to but had refused! to recognise any responsibility. They I had now communicated with the Pub- i lie Trustee, Wellington. and Were ' awaiting further instructions. The Mayor said he had seen Mr Sav-1 well, and he had prm list'd io expedite I

matters. (’r. Kitchingham said the people in 1 the vicinity c» uld not sleep on account ! of the noise of the frogs in the water, I The sections should be drained. , Ci*. Kent said it was a serious nmt- | ter. and had been going on for a bmg ! I while. lie moved that a week’s notice | be given tu the Public Trustee to have I the work done, ami that, if this failed, the work be d"Ue by the Council and I he properties charged'up with the cost I of same. Cr. O'Brien said the place was a disgrace. He was ashamed to puss the] houses nearby. They had passed resolutions re the drainage of these sec- | ions, and m illing had been done. The I state of the sections now was a menace ; ‘o the town. The work should be done ; forthwith. If the owners of the sec- I t ons were not prepared to do the work’ the Council should do it. It was. how-j ever. a|q»arent that the owners were not prepared to do the work, and there- : for the Council should put men on 1o morrow, and h.a\e the meiiac" removed, i Cr. Keiil said he would alter his motion to have the work done at once. There seemed to be a real danger of an epidemic breaking out while they . w a itud. Cr. Kitchingham said he would second the first motion moved bv Councillor Kent. They should wait for a re- ' plv. The legal aspect should be ascer- ' rained. The Council might be trespassing if the workmen went on the people s property. He thought it was early in December that the matter was first briiight up. They had promised Dr. Telford tu have the matter rectified. Cr. Harker said they should ii(|t rush into the matetr. Lt were better to wait for a reply. He moved that the Public Trustee’s reply be waited for. Cr. O'Brien seconded Cr. Kent’s amended resolution. He was surprised to hear Councillors were willing to prorrastinate on such a matter where the public health was at stake. The place was a danger spot. He had discussed ■he matter with the Chairman of the Works Committee, and they had agreed i that the work should be done at once, i They had been dealing with this matter for over two months now. According 1 to Cr. Kitchingham they had promised to have the work done early in December last. If such a plague spot were alongside some of the Councillors’ own houses they would be threatcne<l with writs of mandamus, and injunctions and I what not. Cr. Doogan said they should be care-1 ful what they were doing. Before such ' work was undertaken plans and specifi- I cations should be drawn up. so that they would know what they were doing. On being put to the vote the Mayor • declared the amendment lost on the Cr. Kent asked for a division. The division being taken, only C<’un•illors Kenl and O'Brien voted for - the amendment, wh <-h was declared lost. Cr. Kent: “Another victory for lhe , legal fraternity!” Cr. McGinley moved a further motion that a man be s«*nt up in 1 he morn- ■ ing to st*: if it were possible tn find and clear a draiiuige pipe, or to clear the drain if possible. Th s was seconded and carried unanimvusly. Cr. O Brien: “It is lhe hottest thing I've yet semi here. You have turned •low n our amendment, and have now ! carried a motion which means practi- ' rally the same thing.” -Cr. Doogan: “It dues net mean lite 1 same thing. You wanted to pul. a crowd of incii on.’ 1 ' Cr O’Brien: “The work might not take a couple of hours. Anyhow your attitude lets us know where we are.” The Mayor: “Order! I ve given the Councillors a good deal of latitude.” The incident then closed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19260212.2.26

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 12 February 1926, Page 4

Word Count
792

WHY DELAY? Grey River Argus, 12 February 1926, Page 4

WHY DELAY? Grey River Argus, 12 February 1926, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert