Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FLOUR COMBINE

HEARING OF APPEAL ENDS. DECISION RESERVED. WELLINGTON July 27. Tn the Appeal Court, the flourmilling case to-day concluded. Mr Myers, fcr the respondents, sal'l that if the bakers experienced difficult > in getting the brands of flour they wanted, it was the : r own fault. A:

embargo was in existence, and the Gnvernmdjnt had the power to remedy t.ie position. Any difficulty was the resu’t of sqnie accidental temporary circumstance.

Mr Fair replied to the responden •’ arguments, and the Court reserved its decision.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19250728.2.48

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 28 July 1925, Page 5

Word Count
84

FLOUR COMBINE Grey River Argus, 28 July 1925, Page 5

FLOUR COMBINE Grey River Argus, 28 July 1925, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert