Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHO BLABBED?

SECRET DOCUMENT Leaks from *7 ' T , a Office (Aun ."id A ) ( Kc' ci'. c l ia\ 12 . i < p.m.) LONDON. Max 11. hi the lioUH' <’l ( -nimmi . : Domdd. pul a questimi I" Jlr. , hambcrlaiii regard tn;.*; the* p'l bln ;i: <», i uv »he ■■N.-w Y<-rk VW’Od,' o| ilm (I| i. • r-1 secret memorandum w h ch it is aM-. rtrd ; h ,*| Mi. .'.t'.sieii ( b.ainb.-! (Foreign Minister) presm... . i - die Cab-net in February, rg .i new mdo-T’raneo- Ik'lgiaJi cnicmr. ami -tii.? ri'visior. of Silesian agreemm-t ; r.d the Polish corridor (to the rpihi- S'-.i) as an essential condition u> p.rii’-ii securit \. In reply, Mr. Clrnnd crla’n >; ltd •l.a? the mem'-ra.mlmu appeared Io !•■ • ;• copy of a document cl which anoih?r American newspaper gave an ai-n some two months ago. it x.r.s m.t_ ;u the mililie interest- ! 'o give iiilorimr--m

in regard t» the Foreign Oll’co i-r tfs use or for confidential communication t<> his colleagues here, t,r m ■De other Governments of thf- fempire. lie added that t,h e policy of the (■overii nH . -< exiilaincvl '-. him in tin ]q ( ■ ;i . ( nmnmis mi Mar-ii 2l;n. ...i-i thi is um iiang-'d ?’ . Mac de,-.u.ld asked whether ike puLiid.cd document was iiiaec-ui at. . Mr. Chamberlain deprecah-d c-abrng on the Government to explain wiic-'h r what purported to be a c-oniider. i.d document, which, it it were such, n n<t have been improperly obtained. \.as accurate or not ; bud, any statement < I the Government’s policy which c.-itra-dicted his statement -of March ; - had no authority whatever. Mr. Lansbury asked Sf suc h a i« age of confidential documents »as customary in the Foreign Ollier. !c cause it wa’.s the second time- .-..... u a few months that T *iad iiappe-i -I The Zinovieif letter was the tirsit hai age. Was Mr. Chamberla in hr a-.’.e«l satisfic'd of the good faith of tie- h in his Department? Mr. Chamberlaqji replied ihat. • undoubtedly he was sorry (liai*. am. persions had even been sugg ‘- .< I against these* men.” Replying to Commander lxc-i: w<e >. Mr. Chamberlain said that flits doc'! ment was not c ircidalrd by ‘.bo •■■;! ’i Office. He was not aiwarr <•! ?m « - ctunent. being (-ircn'Med 'o ih • t » - servativo now spa pers.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19250513.2.19

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 13 May 1925, Page 5

Word Count
362

WHO BLABBED? Grey River Argus, 13 May 1925, Page 5

WHO BLABBED? Grey River Argus, 13 May 1925, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert