Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Docket Not Receipt

STAMP DUTY . CASE. WELLINGTON, July 24. - In Hie Court to-il:iy, Air Page, S.M., heard an action brought by the police against the D.1.C., md he’d a docket or roecipt for £2 11 given to a <u.’tomor unstamped, was not a receipt within tho meaning of the Act, and was not liable to st::’ " ■' v. Tho firm e,w . ! , kot was not intended as a ■ but merely as a check on the goods going out of the shop. It was the custom of the firm to have a similar docket made out for all purchases, v,'r for cash or credit, that took place In tho establishment. After dealing with legal authorities. the Magistrate held the docket was a record of business done, and that the docket did not eome with the definition of a receipt.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19230725.2.53

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 25 July 1923, Page 5

Word Count
136

Docket Not Receipt Grey River Argus, 25 July 1923, Page 5

Docket Not Receipt Grey River Argus, 25 July 1923, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert