IRISH QUESTION.
. LONDON, November 2U. In tho Lord's debate, Lord Salisbury t said Ireland's future could not be settled on lines of unity. There were two race's or religions, and no signs of their coming together. , Lord Londonderry said ho believed this Bill contained the germs of peace and contentment. Lord Donoughmore said he opposed Home Rule in any form. There were other speeches. Tliey again revealed some remarkable cross 1 currents. '' Lord Bryce said he did not believe this Bill was likely to produce an Irish settlement. Ho hdped this debate, however, would result in the Government -producing a new scheme, one conceding the fullest self-Govern-ment to Ireland consistent with. England's control of foreign policy, the army and the navy. Lord Aberdeen hoped the Government would offer generous amendments to tho Bill in response to Viscount Grey's suggestions. Lord Mayo said that all Ireland resented the proposal to partition the country. ,^ ._;
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19201129.2.10
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, 29 November 1920, Page 3
Word Count
152IRISH QUESTION. Grey River Argus, 29 November 1920, Page 3
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.