Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

IS THE UNION GUILTY?

* (Per Press Association:)

AUCKLAND, May 13

The Arbitration Court to-day reserved' its judgment am "the case -in which the Inspector of Awards claimed .£2OO from the Watersiders? Union for breach' of the Aci." Judge Sim said the Court would take time to consider dts decision. It was satisfied that there had been a strike, bur the Question' was whether the union could be connected with it.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19120514.2.21.6

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 14 May 1912, Page 5

Word Count
72

ARBITRATION COURT. Grey River Argus, 14 May 1912, Page 5

ARBITRATION COURT. Grey River Argus, 14 May 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert