A LEGAL ARGUMENT.
(Pet- Pfe^s Assbciatibn.)
WELLINGTON, May IS.
: Rep"lyin!g to Air Blair, Sir Robert Stbuit •■said perhaps there was power f<?r 'tWfe cpiiit :..t6; i suspend operation of a writ 'Without such action being regarded ; is a discharge. Mr Blair said if the ObWt decided.; it had no jurisdiction to ideal with the .applicaton regarding ill-health then .the suspension of bgeratioji of the writ was out of the -question.
Sir R. Stout said'tfrere wasa.doubit m "the 'Court's mind Whether the Court could granit or stay proceedings witHout prejudicing the case; and consequently 'defendant would liaye to stay "in tKe shieriff's custody untU Tuesday morning at ten o'cldclc when
the question 'io stay would be" considered. The question of discharge on
the ground of ill-health wbtfld Be dealt with on Friday wffen the'affidavit must h% sfilleH." .:
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19110515.2.33.1
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, 15 May 1911, Page 5
Word Count
136A LEGAL ARGUMENT. Grey River Argus, 15 May 1911, Page 5
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in