THE WAIHI-MOHAKA COLLISION.
Blenheim, December 1. f ",<•< ;'jAt . the Resident, Magistrate's - Court ' to-day the informations against Captain of the Waihi for, not sounding f?f:ftjie;whistle when entering the harbor; on U uwfr-night of the collision with theMphaka !|f £8$ not .exhibiting the'jf oremast" and ; side, j flights ,v?ere gone on with, the evidence ; iJJiowed that the whisle was blown, just ? (before and just after > crossing the /bar, alio on the flats, and a minute before the I j collision.: It was contended, for the defence ( <7j^iati;his was sufficient in the .other: casW It was admitted that on entering [the river the practice was to take ; down the 1 foremast; light and screen the side lights .irithpieces of canvas, in order to avoid the.. >j j|^^_and w jhadows which prevent , ,the - -proper" navigation of ] ',l the narrow riverj .^irtdch is full "of bends and lined with 7?%fltews. Manning stated "that" he was. j compelled to adopt this course from :the 'dangerous condition of the Opawaj'which _•■ had been neglected for years, notwith-" standing frequent complaints to the River , Board oh the subject. He added that : hiding the lights' v was d6rie v from no carelessness or negligence, butdeliberately pandjtfor the^safe.ty.fpf, his vessel. The s_*%illowB at' ; the bend where ■thV_collisTon" took ~ place "were Twenty Feet' high, and . had both steamers carried lights, the^collision could not -have been averted. TlieVWaihi could not have expected to meet the Mohalca, as the latter would have .gojie^fout^ajj,, ebb tide which *:. was contraryl,fo|the s "general rule. Several "legal objections^ -werpiraised for the defence, but ]th^h^ef A^ppint was that the regulations!|o^s|a-|going vessels do not apply within^^ver,Jwhere the captain was justified in] using!his : bwn discretion, and that it wasjie^OTsary ;^.f6r v .the safety of the Waihi tha,t j^e)^slro]alcl^[o, what he did. Pilot Sims^rWeflffifton; who was among the .vitne^seB^lfpr^ure,,. defence, stated that he genera|ly r !i ; Hroaght . steamers from their moorings ~in ; \yel!.ington Harbor to i the wharf without -side lights. Allen, '- R.M., reseryed'his decision in both cases until Th^d>y; ; : : : '.\ ; ;f
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18851202.2.7
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 5359, 2 December 1885, Page 2
Word Count
329THE WAIHI-MOHAKA COLLISION. Grey River Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 5359, 2 December 1885, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.