Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WAIHI-MOHAKA COLLISION.

Blenheim, December 1. f ",<•< ;'jAt . the Resident, Magistrate's - Court '„ to-day the informations against Captain of the Waihi for, not sounding f?f:ftjie;whistle when entering the harbor; on U uwfr-night of the collision with theMphaka !|f £8$ not .exhibiting the'jf oremast" and ; side, j flights ,v?ere gone on with, the evidence ; iJJiowed that the whisle was blown, just ? (before and just after > crossing the /bar, alio on the flats, and a minute before the I j collision.: It was contended, for the defence ( <7j^iati;his was sufficient in the .other: casW It was admitted that on entering [the river the practice was to take ; down the 1 foremast; light and screen the side lights .irithpieces of canvas, in order to avoid the.. >j j|^^_and w jhadows which prevent , ,the - -proper" navigation of ] ',l the narrow riverj .^irtdch is full "of bends and lined with 7?%fltews. Manning stated "that" he was. j compelled to adopt this course from :the 'dangerous condition of the Opawaj'which _•■ had been neglected for years, notwith-" standing frequent complaints to the River , Board oh the subject. He added that : hiding the lights' v was d6rie v from no carelessness or negligence, butdeliberately pandjtfor the^safe.ty.fpf, his vessel. The s_*%illowB at' ; the bend where ■thV_collisTon" took ~ place "were Twenty Feet' high, and . had both steamers carried lights, the^collision could not -have been averted. TlieVWaihi could not have expected to meet the Mohalca, as the latter would have .gojie^fout^ajj,, ebb tide which *:. was contraryl,fo|the s "general rule. Several "legal objections^ -werpiraised for the defence, but ]th^h^ef A^ppint was that the regulations!|o^s|a-|going vessels do not apply within^^ver,Jwhere the captain was justified in] using!his : bwn discretion, and that it wasjie^OTsary ;^.f6r v .the safety of the Waihi tha,t j^e)^slro]alcl^[o, what he did. Pilot Sims^rWeflffifton; who was among the .vitne^seB^lfpr^ure,,. defence, stated that he genera|ly r !i ; Hroaght . steamers from their moorings ~in ; \yel!.ington Harbor to i the wharf without -side lights. Allen, '- R.M., reseryed'his decision in both cases until Th^d>y; ; : : : '.\ ; ;f

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18851202.2.7

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 5359, 2 December 1885, Page 2

Word Count
329

THE WAIHI-MOHAKA COLLISION. Grey River Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 5359, 2 December 1885, Page 2

THE WAIHI-MOHAKA COLLISION. Grey River Argus, Volume XXXII, Issue 5359, 2 December 1885, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert