Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A MISTAKE

COUNTING THE N.S.W. REFERENDUM. ANTI-GOVERNMENT VOTES INCREASED. LANG’S BITTER COMMENT. (U.P.A. by Elec. Ten, Copyright ) SYDNEY, May 16. A re-check of the votes iu Botany disclosed the fact- that- a hour 1280 “No” votes had been wrongly ciedited to “Yes". Tho figures for Botany on Sunday night were- given ns “Ycs' ! 7620, “No” 11.7-10. but as a result °f yesterday’s check counts, the figures are ‘‘Yes” 63-10, ‘No’ 13,034.

The affirmative majority in tho referendum now is ‘2O/At-. "The whole ballot is under suspicion because the Government went out of its way io prevent scrutineers,’ 3 said Air. Lang, referring to the mistake at Botany. “A similar mistake in eight or nine -eats if discovered, would turn an apparent ‘"Yes” majority into a verdict against the Government. That similar mistakes, accidental o r deliberate, have been made in more than eight electorates i s very evident,.’ 3 Tho Attorney-General, Mr. Manning, replies that there is no justification for a suggestion that a mistake of this sort isurht he general because of the absence of scrutineoi Mistakes, of enrso, were possible nrtdcr any system, but the efficiency the present s>st,o,n was demonstrated by the fact that th ; s mistake was discovered hi Uuo and corrected It was proof of Ho sufficiency. not the in.sufficiencv, of the check.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19330517.2.37

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11946, 17 May 1933, Page 5

Word Count
218

A MISTAKE Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11946, 17 May 1933, Page 5

A MISTAKE Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11946, 17 May 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert