Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RUM-RUNNERS SAFE

OVER HOUR’S DISTANCE FROM SHORE.

, U.P.A by Elec. Tel Copyright*

WASHINGTON, Jan, 23

The Supreme Court ruled to-day that British or Canadian rum-running vessels . cannot legally bo boarded, searched, or seized by eoastguardsmen when more than an hour’s sailing distance from the shore. The decision was handed down in a case brought by Frank Cook, a Canadian. Unusual interest attached to it because of the frequent friction from the search and seizure of Canadian and British vessels by coastguardsmen on'tlie look-out for rumrunners.

The court held that the treaty, with Britain, of 1924, which authorised the boarding of British vessels suspected of liquor-smuggling if found within an hour’s sailing of the United States shores had superoded the conflictive provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, under which the United State contended that coastguardsmen were authorised to board British vessels within four leagues of the coast. The Supreme Court ruling regarding the seizure of rum-runners, was handed down in a case which had brought a protest from Canada regarding the seizure of the vessel Mazeltov, 11.1 miles off the Massachusetts coast. The vessel had a speeu of only eight to nine knots.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19330125.2.33

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11842, 25 January 1933, Page 5

Word Count
193

RUM-RUNNERS SAFE Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11842, 25 January 1933, Page 5

RUM-RUNNERS SAFE Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11842, 25 January 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert