Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BOWLS

TOLAGA BAY TOURNEY PLAY STARTS TO-MORROW (Special to the Times.) A record entry of sixteen teams lias come forward for the Tolagn Bay Bowling Club’s annual tournament, which starts to-morrow (Anniversary Day-. Various clubs are represented as -follow's: — Gisborne: Noad, T. F. Crawford, Maude, Engebretsen (s) : J. Park, McCullough. Holmes, Sinclair (s); Pike. L. R. Wright, Armstrong, Stonefiam (s); Henderson, Williams, Holland, McKenzie (s); Balfour, Clarke. 11. E. Bright, I. Stephenson (s) : Nasmith. B. "Whiting, M. W. Craig. J. S. Allan (s) Poverty Bay: W. Wood. Langridge Ross, Hartley, (s); Aiicell, Briggs, Graham. T. Wilson (sY Kalmtin: Hay (junr.), A. Sawyer, D. Bragg. J. J. Martin (s). Tokomaru Bay: W. Brown. Stnford, J. J. Roberts. G. A. Neill (s); Hankey. Findlay, Wat kin, Thompson (sV . Tolajm Bay: Christonherson. N. T*.’ Snutli. Tempest. C. E. Smith (s) ; Reiunc. 3. A. Moore, Morrison. E. Crowlev (s': Boreham. Afattiazzi. C. Tnvlor. \ • F. Ilurlstoup (s); Harries. Hickey. Hoare. J. ATurphy (s'; W. Shaw. F. Smith. Knox, H. Farrell (s). THE DRAW The draw for the tournament is as under; — —First Day—A section, first round: Hurlstone v Sinclair. Wilson v. Thompson, Stoneham v. Farrell, Allan v. Martin. Second round: Hurlstone v. Martin, Sinclair v. Wilson, .Farrell v. Allan. Third round; Thompson v. Allan, Sinclair v. Stonehani, AYilson v. Martin, Hurlstone v Farrell. B section, first round: Siuitli v. Engebretsen, Hartley v. Neill, McLWsnzie v. Crowley. Stephenson v Muirphv. Second round : Smith v. Murphy, Neill v. YleKenzie, Engebretsen v. Hartley, Crowley v. Steplienson. Third round. Neill v. Stephenson, Engebretsen v. McKenzie, Hartley y. Murphy, Smith v. Crowley —Second Day— A sec! ion, fourth round: Thompson v. Farrell. Sinclair v. Martin. Stonehani v. Allan, Hurlstone v. Wilson. Fifth round: Sinclair v. Allan, YYilson v. Farrell, Hurlstone vThompson, Stonehani v. Martin. Sixth round; Wilson v. Stonefiam. Farrell v. Martin. Sinclair v. Tliompson, Hurlstone v. Allan. B seeton. fourth round: Neill v. Crowley. Engebretsen v .Murphy. McKenzie v. Stephenson. Smith v. Hartley. Fifth round: Engebretsen v Stephenson. Hartley v. ( rowley. Smitli v. Neill. McKenzie v. Murphy. Sixth round. Hartley v. AlcKenzie, Crowley v. Murphv, Smith v. Stephen’son, F.n gel ret sen v. Neill.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19320128.2.56.8

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11549, 28 January 1932, Page 6

Word Count
355

BOWLS Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11549, 28 January 1932, Page 6

BOWLS Gisborne Times, Volume LXXIII, Issue 11549, 28 January 1932, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert