Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHOSE BABY?

SCIENTIFIC! JURY DECIDES

CHICAGO, July,2s. •i After bringing the. batteries ol scientific investigation, to bear upon tbo question of- the paternity of the Watkins and 13amburger infants at Englewood Hospital, the experts have given a verdict that' the Watkins baby is the one living with the J3ambergers, and vice-versa. V { The •parents somewhat tearfully have effected an , exchange, being ’tlie/rtselves far from assured. Each mother lias grown fond of the baby in lieu.charge, feeling that it must lie Iters:' ,

• v.Tbe investigation, referred to was inst.tilted when,, upon their being taken to. their respective homes, it wjas found that their labels indicated that a mistake bad been mode.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19300809.2.22

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume LXXI, Issue 11280, 9 August 1930, Page 3

Word Count
109

WHOSE BABY? Gisborne Times, Volume LXXI, Issue 11280, 9 August 1930, Page 3

WHOSE BABY? Gisborne Times, Volume LXXI, Issue 11280, 9 August 1930, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert