Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT ENDORSED

<2u—~c ■ DEPARTMENTS- 5 -'SCHEME FOR TR AINING - TEAC HER S

OTAGO .HOARD WANTS MORE

INFORMATION’

DUNEDIN,

-Tune 13

A special meeting of the Education. Board gave final consideration to the now’scheme proposed hy the Education .Department, to assist young persons to secure training as teachers and came to tlie following conclusion :—•

(1) m the absence of information upon material points, tho board cannot endorse the scheme. Definite information should be furnished m regard to (a) the present loss incurred through non-fulfilment or non-en-forcement of the bond; (b) t’tie possible saving undc-r the proposed scheme; (c) the method of securing repayment of the loan in the event of a student defaulting. (2) The Board is of opinion that the scheme would involve certain risks, such as (a) placing of obstacles in the way of' getting the best hoys and girls to enter the profession; (h) the differentiation in salary between tliose who receive loans and those who do not may lead to difficulties; (c) a. difficulty in providing immediate work for all. students upon the completion of their probationary ns■sistantships. Any agreement, entered into for repayment should, necessarily entail responsibility upon the Department of providing the means of repaying. (3) The Board cmphnlienlly holds that the seh vine should not apply to nrobationers already in the service. These young people entered under existing conditions, and to depart from those conditions would he a distinct hi each of contract.

(J) The Board views with disfavor iho element of class distinction which is introduced bv. reason of (he fact that some students will rtuiuire co takc a loan ad some will not... A reply embodying the Board's conclu.Mons has hern forwarded to the Department, of Education.— P.A.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19270614.2.31

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume LXV, Issue 10303, 14 June 1927, Page 5

Word Count
286

NOT ENDORSED Gisborne Times, Volume LXV, Issue 10303, 14 June 1927, Page 5

NOT ENDORSED Gisborne Times, Volume LXV, Issue 10303, 14 June 1927, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert