Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A WARNING BILL.

STOWAGE OF POISON IN SHIPS’ CARGOES. lii tiie Auckland Police Court, before Mr. C. C. Kettle, S.M., Edwin Thomas Smith, master of the steamship Opawa, was charged with having on board some fifty packages of poison (cyanide of potassium), and failing when reporting the arrival of the vessel to the Customs, as required by law, to inform the Collector at Avick'.and how many and what such packages were on board the steamship, and the place and position in which tliev were stowed. Mr. Mays appeared for tlie'prosecution, and Mr. Prendergast for the defence. Mr. Mays said that on tlie .arrival of tlie Opawa the landing waiter had his attention drawn to 50 packages of cyanide of potassium which were stowed in the vicinity of quantity of food-stuffs. He had heard that this

kind of tiling was going on to a considerable extent, and the fumes of such a poison as cyanide of potassium in tlie ? event of a case being broken,' might prove very serious in their action on food-stuffs. In this case, however, the poison was packed in zinc-lined cases and no breakage occurred. Mr. Prendergast explained that the captain did not take command of the Opawa until she arrived at London, and tho cyanide was shipped at Glasgow. The captain had no personal knowledge of the presence of the poison in the cargo, and the cases were not. distinctly marked, as they should have been. The breach of tlie law was, therefore, technical and quite unintentional, and the blame was really attachable to tlie consignors, His Worship said that in this case

the captain did not intend to commit a breach of the Act, but at the same time be ought to have ascertained what was on hoard, and also should have made himself conversant with the provisions of the laws under which he worked. Future cases would have to lie severely dealt with, but fin the present case, which was probably a “warning bell,” the defendant would lie fined £1 and costs. — Star.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19070330.2.24

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2042, 30 March 1907, Page 3

Word Count
339

A WARNING BILL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2042, 30 March 1907, Page 3

A WARNING BILL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2042, 30 March 1907, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert