Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAHORA APPEAL.

By Telegraph—Press Association. Wellington, last night.

Judgment was delivered this afternoon in the Court of Appeal upon the appeal trom the decision of the Validation Court iu the ease in re Tahora.

The Chief Justice, in giving his decision, said that the question before the Court was simply whether the X alidation Court had jurisdiction to order the removal of a caveat lodged in the District Lands Registry. A large question had been argued whether the Validation Court had any jurisdiction whatever over lands brought before it after making its decree validating and settling the title thereto. His Honor expressed grave doubts whether the Court has any power to administer such lands after making its decree of validation. In any case there was nothing in the statures under winch the Validation Court was constituted giving it any power to order the removal of caveats entered in the Land Transfer Office. In His Honor’s opinion, the Court had not authority to deal with such a caveat. The appeal should therefore be dismissed. Justice Denniston said : that he had arrived at tiic same conclusion, lie did not think the Validation Court could issue orders binding the District Land Registrar. A certificate of title to the trustees had not been issued subject to any restriction or conditions. He did not think the statutes gave the Validation Court any power to administer trusts under its decree, and the parties could not by their consent give it any such jurisdiction. He agreed, therefore, that the appeal should be dismissed.

Mr Justice Conolly concurred in these views.

The decision of the Validation Court, declining jurisdiction, was therefore affirmed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19011101.2.38

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 252, 1 November 1901, Page 3

Word Count
274

TAHORA APPEAL. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 252, 1 November 1901, Page 3

TAHORA APPEAL. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 252, 1 November 1901, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert